Laserfiche WebLink
RECEIVED <br />SWRCB, January 2002 Page of _ <br />9. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING AUG I O, 2015 <br />Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sums ❑ *See comments below <br />Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ P Al <br />Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer ❑ Industry Standard ❑ Professional ngmeer <br />❑ Other (Specify) <br />Test Method Used: <br />❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic <br />❑ Other (Spec) <br />Test Equipment Used: <br />Sump Diameter: <br />Equipment Resolution: <br />Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # <br />Sump Depth: <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />Hi hest Piping Penetration: <br />Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br />Electrical Penetration: <br />Condition of sump prior to <br />testing: <br />Portion of Sump Tested <br />Sump Material: <br />Wait time between applying <br />water and starting test: <br />Test Start Time: <br />Initial Reading (RI): <br />Test End Time: <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />Test Duration: <br />Chane in Reading RF -RI): <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />T�st�I�esalt: �` <br />Is there a sensor in the sump? <br />Does the sensor alarm when <br />either product or water is <br />detected? <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after testing? <br />Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br />*This UST Facility has a combination Piping Sump for Remote Fill Piping and Remote Vapor Piping. <br />*Data is recorded on Page #5 of this report for Piping Sump #2. <br />