COMPLIANCE INFO_2005-2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ir W Dennis Catanyag [EH] From: Dan Crawford [dan.crawford@flyingj.com] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 11:50 AM To: Dennis Catanyag [EH] Cc: gm.ripon@flyingj.com; 'dfm.cwell'; todd.veibell@flyingj.com; Paul.Siler@flyingj.com; Rusty.Mace@flyingj.com Subject: Ripon, CA-Status of SB989 Testing and Repair Work at Flying J Travel Plaza Importance: High Dear Mr. Cantayag, In order to keep you abreast of the SB989 activities being completed at our Ripon, CA travel plaza, provided below is a synopsis of testing that has been performed and the status of repair work that is to be completed. 3/8/05 and 3/9/05 -SB989 testing conducted by Dialysis North - Piping sumps 2, 5, and 6 failed; -Sumps need (3) 3 %2"x 2 W bulkhead fittings and (2)2 W x'/2" reducer test split boots with inserts (these will be going over the 2" pipe and %"copper line (siphon). -Contractor says these can be split because they are used for the test only and will be disconnected after the test. - Pictures were provided to the DFM (and subsequently to other contractors for bidding.) - Under Dispenser Containment(UDCs)failed on dispensers 13/14 and satellite 24 4/28 Dialysis North contacted NTCA to say they were ready to begin repairs 4/29 Dialysis North contacted NTCA to say they declined to handle the repairs because of inability to use split penetration boots 4/29 NTCA contacted Flying J corporate to notify them of the status of events. NTCA began search for another contractor. 4/29-6/17 - NTCA contacted BSSR, Tait, CGRS, and MVP to see if they could repair and conduct the necessary retests. -----Contractors were given pictures and test results provided by Dialysis North. Dialysis North was also contacted to see if they would change their mind about making the repairs. - During this time frame, Flying J was updated regularly of the continued search for a contractor. - NTCA also contacted SJV to confirm that split penetration boots are not allowed. SJV noted that spli penetration boots are not UL listed and are therefore not allowed in their county even though they are widely accepted in other counties in California. -All contractors except MVP declined to bid after reviewing the results, pictures, and site. 6/20 -MVP performed a site visit and gathered information in order to prepare a bid for making the needed repairs 7/6 - MVP presented bid to NTCA 7/6 - NTCA submitted MVP bid to Flying J 7/7 - Flying J began contacting other contractors in order to get competitive costs 7/12 -Flying J notified NTCA they were seeking a more defined scope of work in order to get their own bids from other contractors 7/19 -Flying J received an itemized listing of equipment that needs to be repaired 7/19-27 - Flying J awaiting bid response from other contractors; the response from the other contractors has been very slow because they are swamped completing testing 7/27 -Flying J also requested timeline for completion of activities at this site 7/28/2005