Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 <br /> Cabral—Mc Adams Property <br /> April 28,2006 <br /> Job No. 1828-092.01 <br /> RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br /> As shown on the attached Table I and on the laboratory reports, the data suggest that the <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon impairment to subsurface soils beneath the tank area is very limited and <br /> confined to the immediate vicinity of the former underground tank excavation. The results of the <br /> laboratory analysis for soils from Borings B2 showed TPH as gasoline was identified in the <br /> samples collected from depths of 15 and 20 feet at concentrations of 4,300 milligrams per <br /> kilogram(mg/kg) and 2,100 mg/kg,respectively. Analysis of soil collected from Boring B3 at the <br /> 25-foot interval revealed a concentration of 0.5 mg/kg TPH as gasoline. TPH as gasoline was not <br /> detected above the laboratory reporting limit of 0.5 mg/kg in any of the other soil samples tested. <br /> As shown in the appended laboratory data, the volatile organic compound(VOC)benzene was not <br /> detected above the laboratory reporting limit of 0.005 mg/kg in any of the soil samples submitted <br /> for analysis. Relatively low concentrations of toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes were <br /> identified in the 15- and 20-foot soil samples collected from Boring B2 and the 25-foot soil <br /> sample collected from Boring B3. The oxygenate methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) was not <br /> detected in any of the samples analyzed from Borings B 1 or B2. <br /> Because the deeper samples collected from the borings did not contain petroleum hydrocarbons at <br /> concentrations above laboratory reporting limits, the likelihood of groundwater impairment <br /> attributed to former underground fuel tank is considered low. <br /> Because of the elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons detected in soils in a small area <br /> beneath the area of the former underground gasoline storage tank, it would appear that remedial <br /> efforts with regulatory agency oversight are warranted. Contaminated soil excavation and off- <br /> haul to an appropriate disposal facility would likely be the most feasible and timely remedial <br /> approach. Communications with San Joaquin County Environmental Health Service Division <br /> (SJCEHD) personnel have indicated that the SJCEHD can act as the lead agency for remedial <br /> oversight of petroleum hydrocarbon impacted to soils attributed to leaking underground storage <br /> tanks. <br /> PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION PLAN <br /> General <br /> The results of our investigations indicate that the vertical and horizontal extent of significant <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in soils beneath the area of the former underground <br /> storage tank is limited. Excavation and proper disposal of the petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted <br /> soil is considered the most practical remedial approach. As such we have developed the <br /> following preliminary remedial recommendations. Final remedial procedures can be established <br /> following discussions with the regulatory agency. <br /> Remedial soil excavation and disposal should be performed by a properly licensed hazardous <br /> materials contractor. Excavated soils should be properly handled, manifested and disposed in <br /> accordance with applicable regulations. The remediation contractor should prepare an <br /> Environmental Health and Safety Plan to protect workers from exposure to contaminated soils <br /> during site clearance and remediation activities. <br />