COMPLIANCE INFO_2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SANJ O A Q U I N Environmental Health Department COUNTY— (f) OUNTY(f) Planned changes to improve safety: SSHP Cold Storage has implemented many policies and procedures to promote overall plant,worker and public safety.Nevertheless,SSHP Cold Storage continually strives to improve in all areas,including safety. By utilizing PSMWriter software,all necessary employees have access to every aspect of the CaIARP program.This has improved SSHP Cold Storage's ability to communicate hazardous situations to employees and contractors.In addition,PSMWriter tracks all CaIARP related events so that SSHP Cold Storage's management team can ensure that the CaIARP program is being implemented. SSHP Cold Storage has implemented all aspects of the CaIARP program.When a CaIARP program requirement is completed(i.e.mechanical integrity inspection,hazard review, compliance audit,etc.)then any specific action items related to that event are entered into PSMWriter,assigned a responsible person,and given a due date.Once the action item has been completed,the resolution can be documented using PSMWriter.A list of current or past due action items can be accessed at any time by those with access to PSMWriter. In addition to utilizing PSMWriter to create,schedule,track,and document events,SSHP Cold Storage has also entered into a contract with Resource Compliance to obtain help with CaIARP program implementation. For the future,SSHP Cold Storage now thinks of the CaIARP program as a"living document".It is an interactive framework that guides safe action for SSHP Cold Storage employees,but allows for feedback and continual improvement.Through the CaIARP program SSHP Cold Storage will continue to maintain overall plant worker and public safety. Offsite Consequence Analysis According to the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 19, Chapter 4.5, Article 3, Section 2745.4, if an RMP is required to be submitted the owner or operator shall submit the following information listed below from [CCR, Section 2745.4(b)(1)through (b)(14)] and submit it in the RMP. For Program 1 processes,one worst-case release scenario for each Program 1 process and for Program 2 and 3 processes, one worst-case release scenario to represent all regulated toxic substances held above the threshold quantity and one worst-case release scenario to represent all regulated flammable substances held above the threshold quantity. If additional worst-case scenarios for toxics or flammables are required by Section 2750.3(a)(2)(C), the owner or operator shall submit the same information on the additional scenario(s). The owner or operator shall also submit information on one alternative release scenario for each regulated toxic substance held above the threshold quantity and one alternative release scenario to represent all regulated flammable substances held above the threshold quantity. Worst-case release scenario: (1) Chemical name: Anydrous Ammonia (2) Percentage weight of the chemical in a liquid mixture(toxics only): 100 (3) Physical state (toxics only): Liquid (4) Basis of results (give model name if used): EPA's RMP*Comp (5) Scenario (explosion,fire,toxic gas release, or liquid spill and vaporization): Liquid Spill and Vaporization 13 of 22