My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
3012
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522786
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2020 3:10:30 PM
Creation date
6/30/2020 1:55:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0522786
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0015536
FACILITY_NAME
ARROYOS SMOG SHOP
STREET_NUMBER
3012
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14313024
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3012 E WATERLOO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. and Mrs. Victor Hernandez - 2 - <br /> Claim <br /> 2 -Claim No. 18239 <br /> In addition, section 25299.57(d)(3)(B) of the H&SC reads, in part: <br /> "All claimants who file their claim on or after January 1, 1994...and who did not <br /> obtain or apply for any permit required by subdivision (a) of Section 25284 by <br /> January 1, 1990, shall be subject to subparagraph (A) regardless of the reason <br /> or reasons that the permit was not obtained or applied for. However, on and <br /> after January 1, 1994, the board may waive the provisions of subparagraph (A) <br /> as a condition for payment from the fund if the board finds all of the following: <br /> (i) The claimant was unaware of the permit requirement prior to January 1, <br /> 1990, and there was no intent to intentionally avoid the permit requirement <br /> or the fees associated with the permit..." <br /> Background <br /> The background associated with this site is detailed in the FMD. To summarize, the site <br /> operated as a gasoline station until the early to mid-1970s. In 1975, the site was <br /> occupied by Baxter Truck Sales Company and was later operated as various auto sales <br /> and auto repair facilities. The USTs reportedly were last used in 1974. In 1983, you <br /> acquired the site. At the time of acquisition, the USTs were not disclosed. You first <br /> became aware of the USTs in May 1998, when the San Joaquin Environmental Health <br /> Department (SJEHD) conducted a site inspection and noted the USTs on the site <br /> inspection report. After discovery of the USTs, the SJEHD required the USTs be <br /> registered, back fees and surcharges paid, and the USTs removed under regulatory <br /> guidance. You complied by paying all fees required and removed the USTs on <br /> September 23, 1998. The SJEHD subsequently issued a no further action letter dated <br /> March 17, 2004, and confirmed completion of the UST removal investigation. <br /> On July 19, 2004, a Phase II investigation was conducted for a potential property <br /> transfer. As a result of the Phase II investigation, the SJEHD issued a "Notice of <br /> Responsibility". The SJEHD also issued a directive requiring a workplan to delineate <br /> the lateral and vertical extent of soil and groundwater contamination. On October 5, <br /> 2004, the Fund received your application. Fund staff denied your application by letter <br /> dated April 13, 2005. The Fund Manager upheld the Staff Decision by a letter dated <br /> September 15, 2006. <br /> Discussion <br /> Participation in the Fund is limited to petroleum UST owners and operators who meet <br /> specified requirements. Compliance with the permit requirements is a statutory <br /> condition that must be met to participate in the Fund. There are three instances in <br /> which the claimant may not be subject to the permit requirements. (1) all USTs were <br /> removed prior to January 1, 1990, and not replaced; or (2) the claimant sold the <br /> property and USTs prior to January 1, 1990; or (3) all USTs were decommissioned. A <br /> decommissioned UST is one that cannot have inputs or withdrawals for one or more of <br /> Cali <br /> ornia—,Fa viu olirzz ewlalProtectiorr Agel,cy <br /> O-Recf,c%d Paper <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.