Laserfiche WebLink
of the ground-water aquifer, it is possible that any remaining surface contaminants may <br /> be transported to the first saturated zone of the aquifer. <br /> First ground water is predicted at 120 to 127 feet below ground surface for this Site; <br /> consequently, significant nitrate reduction would be anticipated as the septic effluent <br /> percolates downward. Clay soils, like those found on this Site, also tend to inhibit <br /> downward movement of nitrate due to adsorption of the nitrate ions to the soil. <br /> Sources of Nitrate <br /> Dairies, orchards that require fertilization in sandy soils, and septic systems have been <br /> found to be the most significant sources of nitrate in ground water. <br /> Percolating Recharge-Waters <br /> One of the most determinant factors in the Hantzsche and Finnemore equation is the <br /> rate of recharge from percolating waters, which mix with the downward-percolating <br /> effluent generated by on-site septic systems. In the original Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> paper, "average recharge rate of rainfall" was utilized. <br /> Based on San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department policy (personal <br /> communication, March 18, 2019), the recharge input for the Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> equation should be derived from average monthly precipitation of rainfall and <br /> evapotranspiration rates for the area; the data should be obtained from the California <br /> Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS). Recharge is calculated by first <br /> determining whether the average monthly precipitation exceeds average monthly <br /> potential evapotranspiration. If so, then the difference is the percolating recharge water <br /> into the aquifer. Runoff and stream infiltration drainage are not factored into the <br /> calculation. This approach likely under-estimates recharge to the aquifer and, <br /> consequently, over-estimates nitrate loading. <br /> The Site is located closest to the CIMIS stations at Manteca (station 70) and Holt <br /> (station 248); taking both stations into account will yield a value more representative of <br /> the Site area. Data for the Manteca station were available for the past six years; based <br /> on the calculation shown, the estimated rate of recharge from percolating waters for the <br /> Manteca station is determined to be 3.69 inches (Plate 14). A statistical error of 43 <br /> percent is associated with this value. Data from the Holt station were available for 2017 <br /> through 2019; based on the calculation shown, the estimated rate of recharge from <br /> percolating waters for the Holt station is determined to be 4.04_ inches (Plate 15). A <br /> statistical error of 21 percent is associated with this value. The two stations are then <br /> averaged, for a regional deep percolation value of 3.86 inches. <br /> LOGE 20-22 Page 9 <br />