My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
1770
>
4100 – Safe Body Art
>
PR0538062
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2023 4:23:34 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:13:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4100 – Safe Body Art
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0538062
PE
4120
FACILITY_ID
FA0021983
FACILITY_NAME
PARKWOODS SALON
STREET_NUMBER
1770
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1770 W HAMMER LN
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\BA\BA_4120_PR0538062_1770 W HAMMER_.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Benjamin Escotto [EH] <br /> From: Lee Ballesteros <contactleeb@gmail.com> <br /> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 2:14 PM <br /> To: Benjamin Escotto [EH] <br /> Subject: Re: Body Art Question <br /> Hi Ben, <br /> You don't know how hard and long I have been working on this question ! I have asked all the sources I could <br /> think of to get an acceptable answer to this . I have a couple of suggestions that I make to practitioners. Since <br /> anesthetic is not used (against the law, correct ?) it is actually safe to use a CHG wipe ( chlorihexidine/ <br /> alcohol). The concern regarding this product in use around the eye area is mostly for anesthetized individuals <br /> who are unable to blink to flush the area. Alcohol prep pads can also be used- again, because natural blinking <br /> will flush the sting out. <br /> So, really, there is a lot of resistance to this . If someone can come up with a better answer, I haven't found it <br /> yet. There are some products that are approved in Canada that may be getting approved here soon, but not yet. <br /> These preps will contain PCMX (chloroxylenol ) and are not as irritative to the eye area. <br /> I am still working on this problem so if you get to the bottom of it, let me know. For the time being, I just <br /> suggest to the practitioners that they AT LEAST do a cleansing with some soap &water, and then a sterile <br /> saline wipe. <br /> Thanks for asking, hope it helps a tiny bit.... <br /> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Benjamin Escotto [EH] <bescottoksicehd.com>wrote: <br /> Hello Lee, <br /> I have a question for you. My supervisor, Robert McClellon, and I were doing an inspection for a permanent <br /> cosmetics facility. According to the practitioner, when doing permanent cosmetics,the face is not wiped with <br /> an antiseptic/microbial solution. Section 119308 (a)(6) of the Safe Body Art Act states that, "Immediately prior <br /> to performing the body art, the client's skin shall be prepared with an antiseptic solution, antimicrobial, or <br /> microbicide, according to manufacturer's instructions." We informed the practitioner of this regulation and the <br /> practitioner said that it would not be a problem to prepare the face with an antiseptic solution, with the <br /> exception of the eyes. According to the practitioner, wiping the eyes with an antiseptic solution would be too <br /> irritable for the client. Thus my question for you is, how do you recommend we enforce Section 119308 (a)(6) <br /> of the Safe Body Art Act for permanent cosmetics done around the eyes? <br /> Ben Escotto, Senior RENS <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 E. Hazelton Ave., Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.