Laserfiche WebLink
L-e--p-29-99 04:45P P .07 <br /> • 0 <br /> Similarly Fig.5 and Fig.6 give the values for counter- use. The higher leakage (in, I,Pf in the equations <br /> current regeneration. It should be noted that in this above)so reduces the load on the ion exchange bed <br /> case the nitrate leakage Is lower for a given regener- that for a given operating capacity greater through- <br /> ation level. Hence the possibility to blend treated with puts per cycle are obtained.This latter effect can inf lu- <br /> untreated water on a 50% basis is a useful option once the throughput more than differences In basic <br /> which can make counter-current regeneration attrac- operating capacity. 11 therefore follows that both <br /> tive. On the other hand the choice of co-current capacity and leakage for alternative modes of regen- <br /> regeneration can result in the production of higher vol- eration should be evaluated before recommending <br /> umes of treated water of satistactory quality for direct specific design conditions. <br /> PUROLITE A-520E,COUNTER-CURRENT REGENERATION <br /> Fig.5 OPERATING CAPACITY Fig.6 NITRATE LEAKAGE <br /> VS. RATIO vs. NO; RATIO <br /> NO-+SO: 3 <br /> NO-+SO,* <br /> 1.0 50 <br /> 2 - <br /> Cr 0 <br /> 0 0.8 <br /> Z _J 40 -, <br /> Z Z <br /> 0 15- <br /> LAL <br /> 0.6 U 0 30 <br /> < 150 g Na(41(11.5 ftl ts 0- LJ <br /> 0- 10 U C7 126g4act4(6 MUL <br /> < .0000 <br /> 0 0.4 20 <br /> ANIL 2 - <br /> -15 g Nal(0 W?) H _J <br /> 1 0.2 LU <br /> Ldu <br /> 0 10 180 g NaGLA(11.5 bt I') <br /> 0 0 — 2 01 <br /> 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 <br /> NO; RATIO NO,--RATIO <br /> N0,+So: NO3+SO; <br /> Presupposing that the objective of the nitrate removal native resins. Where lower leakages than the WHO <br /> treatment is to obtain potable water of a quality which limit are required, for example in the processing of <br /> meets the World Health Organization (WHO) limit, certain foods.Purolite A-520E will often give a supe- <br /> where the nitratel(nitrate + sulphate) ratio Is higher rior performance to the standard resins oven where <br /> than 0.6, a nitrate selective resin Is not necessary. A nitrate/(nitrate + sulphate) ratios are higher than 0.6. <br /> standard strong base resin can give higher through- One particular advantage here Is that there is no slug <br /> puts as a result of its higher total capacity. It will be of highly concentrated nitrate�at breakthrough as is <br /> seen that up to the ratio of 0.6 the curves in Figs.3-6 found with standard resins. hence the possibility to <br /> are continuous to show where Purollte A-520E Is the excessively contaminate the food product by over- <br /> recommended resin. The discontinuous curves are running the bed is avoided. <br /> given so that comparisons may be made with alter- <br /> EXAMPLE of calculation <br /> How to use Figs.3 through 6. <br /> It is assumed that it is required to treat a well water of the following analysis to produce a nitrate concentration <br /> of less than 50 mg/1. <br />