Laserfiche WebLink
Kenneth D. Landau -2- 5 June 1987 <br /> 3. At the 817 surface impoundment, high explosives (HE) have been noted in the <br /> upgradient well (817-1) since the beginning of sampling one and one-half <br /> years ago, and in the last quarter the concentration increased by 50 <br /> percent. Several metals also have been found in that well , including <br /> arsenic, barium, selenium, mercury, chromium, copper, and zinc, some above <br /> drinking water standards (the February report calls these "suggested" <br /> drinking water standards, which is not correct). Some of these metals also <br /> have been detected in downgradient wells at 817. The February report <br /> stated wells 80676A and 819 would be added to the 817 sampling network, but <br /> this was not done. A study is needed of the occurrence of HE and metals in <br /> 817 wells, including the source and extent of contamination. A time <br /> schedule for such a study was requested by letter dated 29 December 1986 <br /> but was never submitted. <br /> 4. At the Pit 7 complex, TCE has been found in several wells for more than a <br /> year and its occurrence has now been confirmed by sampling additional wells <br /> in the first quarter of 1987. OCE and several other chlorinated <br /> hydrocarbons also were detected in the latest sampling round. One well <br /> contains TCE above the action level of 5 ppb. The February report states <br /> that the most likely source for these contaminants is the inactive Pit 5 <br /> and that the "TCE has not moved very far from the pit." However, this <br /> latter statement is not corroborated by any evidence. A specific plan is <br /> needed to define the extent of TCE and other chlorinated hydrocarbon <br /> contamination at the Pit 7 complex. <br /> 5. At Pit 1, several metals have been detected including arsenic, chromium, <br /> iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel , and selenium. In the first quarter <br /> of 1987, chromium and lead concentrations were near their respective <br /> drinking water standards in one well. The occurrence of metals in ground <br /> water at Pit I should be tracked closely in the next few quarters to o <br /> determine trends. These constituents may be the subject of the ground <br /> water quality assessment program if a corrected statistical analysis shows <br /> significant increases in indicator parameters. <br /> . 6. Various metals have been detected at Pit 6 wells, including -arsenic, iron, <br /> manganese, mercury, cadmium, nickel, and selenium. Both reports refer to <br /> on-going pump testing at Pit 6 which is supposed to better define aquifer <br /> flow and characteristics. A first draft of the report on 'this study was <br /> under internal review on 15 May 1987 and was scheduled to be submitted by <br /> 30 May 1987. The February report also stated that Wells BC6-10 and BC6-11 <br /> would be added to the Pit 6 sampling network, but this was not done. <br /> 7. Both reports account for many of the detected constituents at all four <br /> sites as "lab artifacts" or "sampling errors." These are not appropriate <br /> explanations for so many different parameters in different locations. If <br /> these explanations are correct, LLNL should institute better sampling and <br /> laboratory practices and seriously consider where the problems lie. <br />