Laserfiche WebLink
Environmgntal <br /> Lawrence Livermore National Liba a*ojiWLTH <br /> P.O. Box 808, L-790, Livermore, CA 94551 j{ pP$}°1$] 2 <br /> May 1995 <br /> Environmental Report 1993 Issued 1995. Public comments will be addressed in the Record of <br /> Decision to be published later this year. <br /> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) Environ- <br /> mental Report 1993 was released in December 1994 by the <br /> Department of Energy(DOE). The report summarizes the Site 300 Fact Sheet Number Two <br /> results of the Lab's environmental monitoring program and <br /> concludes that Lab operations do not threaten human health Distributed <br /> or the environment. The report also finds that the Laboratory <br /> is in compliance with local,state, and federal environmental The Site 300 Fact Sheet Number Two is now available. It <br /> regulatory requirements. summarizes the Site-Wide Remedial Investigation (SWRI) <br /> report issued by DOE/LLNL in April 1994 and describes the <br /> In preparation for writing this report, LLNL's Environmental findings from 10 years of investigations at Site 300. The Fact <br /> Protection Department (EPD) studied the results of more than Sheet also discusses the human health risk assessment, com- <br /> 190,000 analyses of environmental samples taken on and off pleted as part of the SWRI, which analyzes the potential <br /> the Lab site. EPD sampled air,soil,ground and surface water, health effects of the contamination found at Site 300. The <br /> tap water,rain,storm water runoff,waste water,sewer effluent, Fact Sheet presents an updated schedule for submitting reports <br /> vegetation,and foodstuff. The samples were then examined to to regulatory agencies; defines study areas, operable units, and <br /> see if any trace of radioactivity and nonradioactive pollutants unassigned sites; and describes the progress of clean-up activi- <br /> could be detected. ties and upcoming environmental restoration activities. A <br /> copy of the SWRI is available at the Tracy Library and the <br /> The analysis shows that the amount of radiation released from LLNL Reading Room. <br /> the Lab continues to be far below the regulatory limits set to <br /> protect the public. In 1993,radiation from the Lab was less than <br /> 1%of the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) standard. E Calls Labs Internal <br /> The amount of radiation released was slightly higher in 1993 IU <br /> than in 1992 due to extensive radionuclide inventory reduction Environmental Communications <br /> and clean-up activities in the Lab's tritium facility. However, Exemplary <br /> the highest dose that an individual member of the public could p y <br /> receive was calculated to be slightly lower due to mild wind <br /> patterns in 1993. The Environmental Management Assessment,conducted last <br /> summer by DOE's Office of Environmental Audit,found LLNL's <br /> internal environmental communications exemplary. The report <br /> Public Meeting onuil in 834 stated that all levels of Lab management and staff exhibited a <br /> g high level of commitment to environmental excellence. <br /> Remediation Plan <br /> Several areas were singled out as"exceptional"by the DOE, <br /> The area designated Building 834 is the first of six areas at the including the Laboratory's emergency preparedness planning <br /> Lab's Site 300 for which a plan was developed for remediating and response program, the Lab's internal communications <br /> traces of trichloroethylene (TCE)found in soil,rock, and program(for effectively conveying awareness of environmental <br /> ground water. The plan was discussed at a public meeting in issues), and the Lab's environmental planning program. <br /> Tracy,California,on Tuesday,January 24, 1995. Representa- <br /> tives from DOE/LLNL, the EPA,and the State of California The report identified eight minor deficiencies having to do with <br /> discussed the proposed remediation plan and responded to DOE's organizational structure. Most of these had previously <br /> questions and concerns from the public. been identified by the Lab and DOE's Oakland Operations <br /> Office, and corrective actions have been planned or completed. <br /> A 30-day public review and comment period on the Building <br /> 834 remediation plan began January 9 and ended February 9, <br /> Recyclable <br />