My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1992
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SPERRY
>
1051
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0504217
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2020 11:49:01 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:35:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1992
RECORD_ID
PR0504217
PE
4430
FACILITY_ID
FA0004231
FACILITY_NAME
J M EAGLE (WS)
STREET_NUMBER
1051
STREET_NAME
SPERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17728039
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1051 SPERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
CField
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4430_PR0504217_1051 SPERRY_1992.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KLEINFELDER <br /> asbestos, the DTSC threshold for hazardous waste. Soils containing greater than or equal to <br /> 1% asbestos will be remediated. Those with trace levels below I% will be left undisturbed. <br /> Without regulatory cleanup levels at the state or federal levels, the proposed cleanup level of <br /> 1% is a reasonable vehicle to drive the remediation. <br /> A second issue related to soil remediation is the lateral limits of the remediation. As can be <br /> seen from Drawing 2, there are a number of isolated points (underlined sample numbers) <br /> where surface soil concentrations in excess of 1% were found but the surrounding sample <br /> concentrations were not similarly elevated. The question becomes what criteria are to be used <br /> to set the lateral limits for remediation of these isolated points. Instead of taking a number of <br /> additional samples (140 soil samples have already been collected and analyzed for asbestos) in <br /> an attempt to delineate the extent of the surface soil contamination at an isolated point, surface <br /> topography and other features will be used to estimate the lateral extent of remediation. For <br /> instance, if a- suspect sample location is intersected by a drainage Swale leading from the <br /> manufacturing area, it would be reasoned that the swale was responsible for contamination in <br /> the specific area. The surface soil in and around the swale would be considered to be <br /> contaminated and would be remediated. In a situation where there are no features or indicators <br /> that could be used to estimate the lateral extent of contamination, a radius of 20 feet around <br /> the sample point would be remediated. After remediation, a limited number of confirmation <br /> samples would be collected immediately outside the area of excavation. <br /> 6.1.2 Methods of Remediation <br /> Two methods of remediation have been selected for asbestos surface soil contamination. The <br /> first method will utilize capping of WMUs. At contaminated sample points failing within the <br /> footprint of one of the WMUs, the cap that will be placed over the WMU will also cover the <br /> surface soil contamination. The second method utilizes areas that fall outside of WMU <br /> footprints. In these areas, the contaminated soil will be excavated to a depth of one foot and <br /> then backfilled with clean soil. The lateral extent of the excavation will be established using <br /> the approach discussed in Section 6.1.1. After excavation the contaminated soil will be <br /> PP , <br /> transported to the surface impoundments for disposal. The surface impoundments will then be <br /> capped. <br /> CR14-92-12 Page 24 of 39 24-220109-1709 <br /> Copyright 1992 KLeinfetder, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.