Laserfiche WebLink
t V <br />COMMISSION MEMBE, <br />JAMES F. CULBERTSON, CHAIRMAN <br />LODI CITY COUNCILMAN <br />FRANK HOYT <br />STH DIST. SUPERVISOR <br />ROGER M. HUCKINS <br />STOCKTON CITY COUNCILMAN <br />HAROLD NELSON, VICE CHAIRMAN <br />PUBLIC MEMBER <br />CLIFFORD WISDOM <br />2ND DIST. SUPERVISOR <br />CLYDE L. ABBOTT, ALTERNATE <br />TRACY CITY COUNCILMAN <br />LOREN POWELL, ALTERNATE <br />ORD DIST. SUPERVISOR <br />4-F <br />COUR SR <br />STOCKTON,CAL RNIA <br />y TELEPHONE 044.2021 <br />EXECUTIVE OFFICRR <br />SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RALPH W. EPPERSON <br />-- COUNTY CLERK <br />LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION <br />LEGAL COUNSEL <br />COUNTY COUNSEL <br />March 1, 1967 <br />C. P. Kenyon <br />County 'Urrinistrator <br />Courthouse <br />Stock -ton, California <br />Wilbur .,ef fler <br />Country Assessor <br />Court ,-� se <br />_)tock ,c, ., California <br />Richard Dickenson <br />County Counsel <br />Courthouse <br />Stockton, California <br />Gentlemen: <br />XJack Williams <br />Local Health District <br />1601 E. Hazelton , <br />Stockton, California <br />Richard Salter <br />County Planner <br />1850 E. Hazelton <br />Stockton, California <br />Clem Plecarpo <br />County Surveyor <br />P.O. Box 1810 <br />Stockton, California <br />:e Local Agency Formation Commission has had the attached <br />-propo. it from the City of Stockton under consideration since its <br />submission at the December 21, 1.1-66 meeting. It was suggested <br />I by th:: Chairman of the Local Agency Formation Commission that a <br />county staff review the proposal and s ,br^.it its report, taking <br />into consideration LAFCo responsibility for promoting orderly <br />E-;rowth. <br />This Commission's first indication was that this was an <br />improper annexation, but upon additional testimony and further <br />consideration it was felt that since the Commission is charged <br />with the responsibility for orderly growth within the County <br />that perhaps additional consideration should be rendered by <br />staff people. <br />On the bas -.1s of the statements in the justification pro- <br />posal the reason for annexat::on of the strip was to enable the <br />City of -Stockton to furnish domestic sewer services to the <br />Johns,`,—nvi�ie mart. However, it is a well known fact that <br />the city's tirr..t _ intent is to acquire a contigious boundary <br />to the area Bout. of Sperry Road for further industrial develop- <br />ment. <br />