My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1993-2017
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
0
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0504909
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1993-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2024 11:06:34 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:37:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1993-2017
RECORD_ID
PR0504909
PE
4430
FACILITY_ID
FA0006400
FACILITY_NAME
RIVERBANK CITY DUMP
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIVERBANK
Zip
95367
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
SANTA FE RD
P_LOCATION
99
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4430_PR0504909_0 SANTA FE_1993-2017.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I V. Surface Con*ns <br /> A. Is site access adequately restricted? (Y/N) <br /> B. Is the waste adequately coverpd to prevent hum n ontact? <br /> VN) I-" e4 <br /> C. Is the final drainage system for the site adequate to prevent erosion? <br /> (Y/N) 61 <br /> D. Is the final grading adequate to promote run-off? (Y/N) A/ <br /> E. Are slopes greater than 3:1 (33% or 18 degrees)? (Y/N) <br /> F. Are slopes greater than 1.75:1 (57% or 30 degrees)? (Y/N)O A/12- <br /> V. Postclosure Land Use <br /> A. Oas the land use of the site significantly changed since closure? <br /> /N) <br /> If yes, include or reference site improvement plans and answer the following: <br /> 1. Give the date that the improvements were constructed <br /> 2. Have the improvements compromised the integrity of the final <br /> cover? (Y/ A) <br /> 3. Has differential settlement affected the improvements? <br /> B. Is there a proposed change in postclosure land use that may jeopardize <br /> the integrity of previously closed sites or p9pe a potential threat to public <br /> health and safety or the environment? (Y/ <br /> If yes, briefly describe the proposed project: <br /> C. Is there a postclosure land use tracking system? (Y16) i— <br /> If yes, describe tracking system: <br /> VI. Disposal Site Priority (See Prioritizatinn Chart) <br /> A1: AZ—A 3: B1: B2:—B 3- C1: C2:,K_- C 3:_ D: <br /> Vill. Comments <br /> PREPARED BY: <br /> DATE: <br /> COMPLIANCE BRANCH REVIEW: <br /> CIWMB CLOSURE AND REMEDIATION BRANCH APPROVAL: <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> ciwmB closure and Remediation Branch (1/25193) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.