Laserfiche WebLink
Data Evaluation Checklist--General Chemistry <br /> Location and Quarter; Sr; <br /> Reviewers Initials and Date Reviewed; '5✓ Method; J* <br /> SDG: ) <br /> Review Questions <br /> i• Were holding times met? Yes No Sample(Analytes)Affected/Comments <br /> 2 Were sample preservation requirements met? Flag <br /> 3• Was cooler receipt form completed? <br /> 4• Was method blank analyzed with each batch? <br /> s Were target analytes reported In the method blank below <br /> the MDL? If Yes, evaluate low level determinations of <br /> target analytes, <br /> �• Were target analytes reported in the method blank above <br /> the MDL? <br /> 7 Were target analytes reported in field blank or rinsate <br /> samples above the MDL? <br /> $• Was a field duplicate analyzed? Were RPDs within <br /> contract specifications? <br /> 9• Was an LCS analyzed with each batch? <br /> 10. Were LCS recoveries within contract spocificativns? <br /> 11, If applicable,was an MS/MSD pair analyzed with each <br /> batch? <br /> 11 Were MS/MSD recoveries and RPDs within contract <br /> specifications? <br /> 13. Were initial and continuing calibration standards <br /> analyzed at the contract-specified frequency for each <br /> instrument? v <br /> 14• Were these results within specifications? <br /> I5. Was a laboratory duplicate analyzed? Were RPDs within <br /> contract specifications? V1 <br /> 15. Were lab comments in report? If yes, summarize <br /> contents. v <br />