Laserfiche WebLink
Data Evaluation Checklist—General Chemistry <br /> Location and Quarter: Method: �rX JO <br /> Reviewers initials and Date Reviewed:' SDG: O k �/X t <br /> Review Quest ons Yes No Sample(Analytes)Affected/Comments Flag <br /> 1. Were holding times met? <br /> 2. Were sample preservation requirements met? <br /> 3. Was cooler receipt form completed? V <br /> 4. Was method blank analyzed with each batch? ✓ <br /> 5. Were target analytes reported in the method blank below <br /> the MDL? if yes, evaluate low level determinations of S/ <br /> target analytes. <br /> 6. Were target analytes reported in the method blank above <br /> the MDL? V <br /> 7. Were target analytes reported in field blank or rinsate <br /> samples above the MDL? {I/� <br /> 8. Was a field duplicate analyzed? Were RPDs within <br /> contract specifications? <br /> 9. Was an LCS analyzed with each batch? <br /> 10. Were LCS recoveries within contract specifications? <br /> 11, if applicable,was an MS/MSD pair analyzed with each <br /> batch? <br /> 12. Were MS/MSD recoveries and kPDs within contract <br /> specifications? <br /> 13. Were initial and continuing calibration standards <br /> analyzed at the contract-specified frequency for each <br /> instrument? N� <br /> 14. Were these results within specifications? <br /> 15. Was a laboratory duplicate analyzed? Were RPDs within <br /> contract specifications? V <br /> 16. Were lab comments in report? I yes,summarize <br /> contents. <br />