My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PALM
>
11651
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0519121
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2020 2:40:39 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:38:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0519121
PE
4430
FACILITY_ID
FA0005798
FACILITY_NAME
SOUTHWEST HIDE COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
11651
STREET_NAME
PALM
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
22809005
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
11651 PALM LN
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
CField
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4430_PR0519121_11651 PALM_.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Doug Ohland -2- 16 June 1993 <br /> f + Southwest Hide <br /> The background level for salt concentrations needs to be determined. If <br /> Southwest Hide intends to leave or use wastes as fill in the pond excavation, <br /> then a designated level for salts must be established. Southwest Hide must <br /> determine the amount of contaminated soil with salt concentrations above the <br /> designated level . Southwest Hide must develop alternatives for disposing of <br /> all the wastes, if any, remaining below the surface impoundments. <br /> On page 15, the Plan states that the asphaltic concrete surface, which will be <br /> used as the cap, is designed to resist cracking under all anticipated traffic <br /> and weather conditions and attains a permeability of less than 1 x 10-6 <br /> cm/sec. No specific data are used to demonstrate that the asphalt concrete <br /> surface was the engineering equivalent to the construction standard stated in <br /> Section 2540 of Chapter 15. Also, no cost estimates were included in the <br /> closure plan for the closure approach selected or the other approaches not <br /> selected. Cost estimates need to be included for the post-closure period <br /> which should include the costs identified in the asphalt maintenance schedule. <br /> Appendix II of the Plan discusses the permeability testing on the asphalt. <br /> The data indicate that the laboratory, after making several adjustments to the <br /> sample, was able to get a permeability less than 10-6 cm/sec under laboratory <br /> conditions. However, it is not clear whether or not the laboratory conditions <br /> are representative of field conditions. Furthermore, actual field <br /> permeability may be higher due to varying field conditions. We would expect <br /> laboratory results to be on the order of 10' cm/sec or lower to have greater <br /> confidence that the field permeabilities were adequate. Since a large portion <br /> of the reduction in permeability is due to the pavement fabric being used <br /> between the layer of asphalt, more documentation is needed to determine the <br /> suitability of the fabric as liner material . What is the thickness of the <br /> asphalt cap? <br /> Appendix III is supposed to present information that demonstrates that the <br /> soils at Southwest Hide have the engineering properties necessary for cover <br /> foundation material . The 5 October 1992 letter from Reinard W. Bradley, <br /> Consulting Airport Engineer, discusses the use of bituminous surface course <br /> mix design (P-401) for an airport apron at Stockton Metropolitan Airport. It <br /> is unclear what the relevancy of this information has to do with the use of <br /> compacted on-site soils for foundation materials as indicated on page 14. <br /> The final approval of the closure of the two surface impoundments will be <br /> based on Southwest Hide demonstrating that either all contaminated soils are <br /> removed from the site or that the contaminated soils left at the site are not <br /> a designated waste and that the proposed closure alternative meets the <br /> performance goals of Chapter 15. All information submitted in future reports <br /> or the CQA reports must address these issues, otherwise the closure will not <br /> be deemed complete. <br /> The Closure Plan was submitted without the stamps of the individuals signing <br /> off on the document. The signature page must be stamped if the Report is <br /> required to be completed under the direction or supervision of a professional <br /> engineer or geologist. Please submit a new signature page for the Closure <br /> Plan with the appropriate stamp for each person that signs the documents. All <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.