My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
2441
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0526162
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2020 2:37:20 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0526162
PE
4430
FACILITY_ID
FA0004701
FACILITY_NAME
TEICHERT PRECAST STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
2441
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16334009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2441 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
CField
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4430_PR0526162_2441 W CHARTER_FILE 1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V. Surface Conditions <br /> A. Is site access adequately restricted? (YM) Yes,perimeter fencing,gate,and levee. <br /> B. Is the waste adequately covered to prevent human contact? (Y/N) Yes,2-4 feet of cover over the site. <br /> C. Is the final drainage system for the site adequate to prevent erosion? (Y/N) Yes <br /> D, Is the final grading adequate to promote run-off? (Y/N) Yes,sloped to the east,however,filling has effected. <br /> E. Are slopes greater than 3:1 (33%or 18 degrees)? (Y/N) Yes,on the south and north facing slopes <br /> F. Are slopes greater than 1.75:1 (57%or 30 degrees)? (Y/N) No <br /> G. Comments Cover was recently filled as required for fire control. Should mow the grass rather than fill to minimize the <br /> potential for impacting the cover and grading/drainage. <br /> V1. Postclosure Land Use <br /> A. Has the land use of the site significantly changed since closure? (Y/N) Unk If yes,include or reference site improvement <br /> plans and answer the following: Uncertain when site dosed. Office building and manufacturing building were constructed <br /> within 1,000 of the disposal area. <br /> 1 Give the date that the improvements were constructed: Based on a site photo in the Brooks Products'office,prior to <br /> 1982. <br /> 2. Have the improvements compromised the integrity of the final cover? (Y/N/NA) No <br /> Structures were not built on the disposal area and there are no pans to build on the disposal area. <br /> 3. Has differential settlement affected the improvements? (Y/N) No <br /> B. Is there a proposed change in postclosure land use that may jeopardize the integrity of previously closed sites or pose a <br /> potential threat to public health and safety or the environment? (Y/N) No <br /> If yes,briefly describe the proposed project: (Brooks Products has submitted plans to the City of Stockton to build a new <br /> office building(within 1,000 feet of the disposal area)adjacent to the existing office. After the new office is complete,the existing <br /> office will be demolished. The new office will have a concrete slab.) <br /> C. Is there a postclosure land use tracking system? (YIN) Yes If yes,describe the tracking system: <br /> EA is to be notified of any construction on the property,linked to building permits. <br /> EA to conduct annual inspections to monitor cover conditions and postclosure land use. <br /> V11. Disposal Site Category(See Classification Chart) <br /> Primary A.- F-1 B: El C: 0 D: M U: E] X F] <br /> Secondary 2: El 3: r-J <br /> Vill. Comments: Completed trenching to evaluate previous dumping activities. Based on the trenching,it appears that the site was <br /> used as a bum dump and covered. Potential for gas generation and subsequent migration is minimal since the site was previously <br /> used as a bum dump. No confirmed release of landfill gas or leachate seeps with significant threat of pollution or nuisance. <br /> Site is adequately covered and minimal action is needed to prevent human contact with the waste. There are inhabitable structures <br /> within 1,000 feet of the disposal area. Therefore,a C1 site ranking. <br /> Recommend rr-rr,,ing the vegetation rather than tilling to minimize the impact on the cover, <br /> Prepared By: Date 7! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.