COMPLIANCE INFO_1972-1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LODI C" Y CnU7 1QMAN HAROLD R, NELSON, vwu C"WRMAN Pt PLIC ME;Inm CHARLES E. D I 5 1 (.1 C is T I.) N CIT" C 0 CI L I MJ ADRIAN C. 57" DISTRICT RiPCINVISDR CLWFORD C. WKDOhl 2ND WSIRIC, 5UPFIAWSOR GEORGE L. BARBER, ALTERNATE WTH DISTRICT EUPERVISOR STANLEY MORTENSEN, ALYFRNATE-7 R_,F3L_,C %1LM-3t-H CARL J.M. V:LEN, A1EaI�A7[, ESCAL.ON CITY COUNCILMAN March 12, 19f70 TO: FROM SUBJECT: DISCUSSION: SAN JOAQUI' COIJNTY LOCAL. AGDv',-_Y FORhA'ATICIN CMIUMSSIICTI LAFC COIIIMissiONEERS RALPh W. EPPERSON7 EXECUTIVE OFFICER =CUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT CC)URTHOUSE STOCKTON, CALIPOP%al, E L E;' � -1 EX&CUTHE OFFQER RALPH W. UPrERSON COUNTY CLERK LEGAL COUNSEL GERALD A. SIHERViN COUNTY COUNSW RE: AUSTIN ROAD DISPOSAL SITE DETACH1,21NT, D-1-76, FROM THE CITY OF STOCKTON (LAFC A-8-76) AND AUSTIN ROAD DISPOSAL SITE ANNEXATION, A-1-76, TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON (LAFC A-9-76) The two subject proposals are directly related and will therefore be reviewed to— gether. The purpose of these combined applications is to allow the City to transfer its jurisdiction from an exhausted landfill solid waste disposal site to the adjacent site of current operations. Jurisdiction in this case is noncontiguous annexation of City—owned land in municipal use exclusively® Controlling legislation allows a maximum of 100 acres under noncontiguous annexation at any one time® It is there— fore necessary to detach the 90.91 acre exhausted site before annexing the new 89.09 here parcel, The City has submitted written consent as sole owner of all affected land for both the detachment and the annexation. The proposals are consistent with County and City General Plans. Favorable proposal evaluations have been submitted by the Stockton Community Development Department, County Planning Department, San Joaquin Local Health District, USDA Soil Conservation Service, County Public Woeks Department, and Offices of the Sheriff and County Assessor® Staff has been contacted by a Collegeville Fire Protection District Board of Directors member who indicated that some consideration is being given to re- questing withdrawal of affected land from the fire district® The Executive Officer has performed environmental assessments pursuant to the Com— mission's adopted guidelines for implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. The resultant determinations are that the projects will not have significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore preparation of Environ. - mental Impact Reports is not required. Copies of Negative Declarations proposed for adoption by the Commission are attached. There is on file with the Commission a Notice of Determination, prepared by the City, affirming that the project will 000 1 FEW-! SAN JOAQUI' COIJNTY LOCAL. AGDv',-_Y FORhA'ATICIN CMIUMSSIICTI LAFC COIIIMissiONEERS RALPh W. EPPERSON7 EXECUTIVE OFFICER =CUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT CC)URTHOUSE STOCKTON, CALIPOP%al, E L E;' � -1 EX&CUTHE OFFQER RALPH W. UPrERSON COUNTY CLERK LEGAL COUNSEL GERALD A. SIHERViN COUNTY COUNSW RE: AUSTIN ROAD DISPOSAL SITE DETACH1,21NT, D-1-76, FROM THE CITY OF STOCKTON (LAFC A-8-76) AND AUSTIN ROAD DISPOSAL SITE ANNEXATION, A-1-76, TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON (LAFC A-9-76) The two subject proposals are directly related and will therefore be reviewed to— gether. The purpose of these combined applications is to allow the City to transfer its jurisdiction from an exhausted landfill solid waste disposal site to the adjacent site of current operations. Jurisdiction in this case is noncontiguous annexation of City—owned land in municipal use exclusively® Controlling legislation allows a maximum of 100 acres under noncontiguous annexation at any one time® It is there— fore necessary to detach the 90.91 acre exhausted site before annexing the new 89.09 here parcel, The City has submitted written consent as sole owner of all affected land for both the detachment and the annexation. The proposals are consistent with County and City General Plans. Favorable proposal evaluations have been submitted by the Stockton Community Development Department, County Planning Department, San Joaquin Local Health District, USDA Soil Conservation Service, County Public Woeks Department, and Offices of the Sheriff and County Assessor® Staff has been contacted by a Collegeville Fire Protection District Board of Directors member who indicated that some consideration is being given to re- questing withdrawal of affected land from the fire district® The Executive Officer has performed environmental assessments pursuant to the Com— mission's adopted guidelines for implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. The resultant determinations are that the projects will not have significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore preparation of Environ. - mental Impact Reports is not required. Copies of Negative Declarations proposed for adoption by the Commission are attached. There is on file with the Commission a Notice of Determination, prepared by the City, affirming that the project will