Laserfiche WebLink
J11 JY.,LGl lull. ' <br />Borrd_r_6dO'rses <br />Waste Disposal Program <br />A proposed joint attack on Drake said F o r w a r d Inc., <br />the problems of solid waste which opera t e s a garbage <br />disposal within San Joaquin transfer station on Lovelace <br />County, involving the county's Road, will go to the County <br />city m a n a g e r s and public Board of Zoning Adjustment. on <br />works officials as well as Aug. 10 for a permit for a <br />c o u n t y authorities, was en 157 -acre solid waste disposal <br />' <br />f Supervisors. this week by the Board facility on Austin Road near, , <br />of Supervisors. <br />County Administrator ' L. J. the existing City of Stockton'i <br />Drake, who proposed the uni- operation. <br />fied approach to the problem, The Forward Inc. proposal <br />envisions a `"review team" of calls for use of recycling meth-li <br />the city and county officials to ods and other techniques, <br />examine various means of dis- A major stumbling block to <br />posing of solid waste and study development of a totally new, <br />hg,xfitiv hof each. countywide, approach to t h el <br />problems of disposing of solid <br />waste, Drake said, is the fact <br />that the county and various cit -1 <br />s h a v e separate contracts <br />i t h companies performing <br />solid waste disposal services. <br />Another question mark, he <br />added, is the issue of whether <br />the cities will be willing to set l <br />aside their traditional method sI <br />of dealing with solid waste dis_I <br />posal problems and join in ail <br />unified, countywide system. " <br />... There is no uniformity a:nri l <br />there are existing legal agree-' <br />ments and there are proposals' <br />which must be. evaluated be-, <br />fore action of a long-range na-' <br />ture is taken,"&ake <br />