Laserfiche WebLink
INFORMATION SHEET <br /> The City of Stockton proposes to discharge treated ground water from the T <br /> extraction of ground water polluted by leakage from the unlined Class III <br /> landfill . PolIuted ground water has been detected 1000 feet downgradi ent to the <br /> northeast of the landfill . The ground water treatment system is designed to <br /> treat 400 gpm (580,000 gpd) of extracted ground water. About 305 gpm (440,000 <br /> gpd) will be discharged to Littlejohns Creek tributary to the San Joaquin River. E <br /> Pumped ground water will be treated by passing it through an air stripper, then <br /> the stripped air serially passed through two exchangeable activated carbon units, <br /> and the water discharged to a holding tank prior to discharge to Littlejohns <br /> Creek. The activated carbon units are regenerated or disposed off-site. <br /> The proposed treatment system should be capable of dependably removing volatile <br /> organic constituents to non-detectable concentrations as determined by current <br /> analytical technology. The 30-day median effluent limitations have, therefore, <br /> been set to less-than the limit of detection (0.5 Vg/1 ) for benzene, ethyl <br /> benzene, toluene, xylene, and other volatile organics in EPA Methods 601 & 602. <br /> The Daily Maximum effluent concentrations are established to allow for some <br /> effluent quality variation and the false positive analytical results inherent in <br /> analyses near the limits of detection. For volatile organics, the Daily Maximum <br /> Effluent Limitation has been set at ten times the detection limit. <br /> Water quality objectives adopted pursuant to the Inland Surface Waters Plan are <br /> applicable to the discharge. The Discharger has not sampled for all substances <br /> in Table I and 2 of the Inland Surface Waters Plans (91-12-WQ); however, the <br /> Discharger will be required to conduct a study to determine whether regulated A <br /> constituents are present in the discharge and if so, what effluent limits are <br /> necessary for compliance with water quality objects. <br /> These waste discharge requirements will also function as the individual storm <br /> water permit. This permit requires the Discharger to take steps necessary to <br /> reduce or eliminate industrial storm water pollution. the Discharger is also <br /> required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to prevent <br /> contaminants in the runoff from adversely affecting water quality. <br /> Chronic effluent toxicity monitoring will be required since the discharge will <br /> constitute at least fifty percent of the flow in the receiving water. The <br /> proposed chronic effluent toxicity monitoring should consist of chronic toxicity <br /> tests employing three species (Pimeghales gromelas, Ceridaphnia dubia, <br /> Selenastrum capricornutum) as specified in EPA 600/4-89/001 (March 1989) "Short- <br /> Term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving <br /> Waters to Freshwater Organisms" . <br /> If the chronic toxicity testing results indicates that the Discharger may be <br /> contributing toxicity to Littlejohns Creek, the Discharger shall submit a <br /> Technical Report containing and analyzing the results of the toxicity testing, <br /> identifying the sources of the toxicity, and proposing a time schedule for <br /> eliminating toxicity. Once the absence of toxicity has been satisfactorily <br /> demonstrated, the Discharger shall commence compliance monitoring. Compliance <br /> monitoring shall consist of collecting quarterly samples and conducting chronic <br /> toxicity tests as specified in EPA 600/4-85/014. Only the most sensitive species <br />