My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1989-1996
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1989-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 9:40:02 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1989-1996
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1989-1996.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
660
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STANDARD PROVISIONS AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS -7- <br /> Waste Discharge to Land <br /> E. Dischargers Exempt from Subchapter 15 (continued) <br /> effluent limits) is prohibited. The Board may take enforcement action <br /> against the discharger for by-pass unless: <br /> a. (1) By-pass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal <br /> injury, or severe property damage. (Severe property damage <br /> means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the <br /> treatment facilities that causes them to become inoperable, or <br /> substantial and permanent loss of natural resources that can <br /> reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a by-pass. <br /> Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by <br /> delays in production) ; and <br /> (2) There were no feasible alternatives to by-pass, such as the <br /> use of auxiliary treatment facilities or retention of untreated <br /> waste. This condition is not satisfied if adequate back-up <br /> equipment should have been installed in the exercise of <br /> reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a by-pass that would <br /> otherwise occur during normal periods of equipment downtime or <br /> preventive maintenance; or <br /> b. (1) by-pass is required for essential maintenance to assure effi- <br /> cient operation; and <br /> (2) neither effluent nor receiving water limitations are exceeded; <br /> and <br /> (3) the discharger notifies the Board ten days in advance. <br /> The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated by-pass as <br /> required in paragraph B.I. above. <br /> 3. A discharger that wishes to establish the affirmative defense of an <br /> upset (see definition in E.6 below) in an action brought for <br /> noncompliance shall demonstrate, through properly signed, <br /> contemporaneous operating logs, or other evidence, that: <br /> a. an upset occurred and the cause(s) can be identified; <br /> b. the permitted facility was being properly operated at the time of <br /> the upset; <br /> c. the discharger submitted notice of the upset as required in <br /> paragraph B.I. , above; and <br /> d. the discharger complied with any remedial measures required by waste <br /> discharge requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.