Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> v, <br /> APR 0 1992 <br /> March 30 , 1992 0! f,PE <br /> `1'O: Attendees- Austin Road Landfill Meeting at RWQCB, <br /> Sacramento <br /> FROM: Mike Miller, City of Stockton <br /> SUBJECT: Minutes of March 11 1992 Meeting Concerning Austin Road <br /> Landfill Remediation Project <br /> Below is a summary of the major issues we discussed at the meeting <br /> on March 11 , 1992 . If any of this differs from your understanding <br /> of what transpired, I would appreciate you letting me know as soon <br /> as possible . <br /> 1 . Groundwater Treatment Plant Design Parameters : Bill Marshall <br /> said lie would like to see the analysis which was done to establish <br /> the treatment system design efficiency parameters . Mark Thomas <br /> ( EMCOM) said EMCON has that information available would send it to <br /> the regionai board. <br /> 2 . NPDES Permit : Wayne Pierson (RWQCB- NPDES SECTION) said his <br /> section was overloaded with work and short of staff and as a result <br /> would not be able to review the Austin Road Landfill NPDES permit <br /> application immediately. Wayne said Pat Leary of his staff would be <br /> working on the application when she could get to it . <br /> Mr . Pierson also asked if the water being treated contained metals . <br /> Mark Thomas ( EMCON) responded that since it was ground water, <br /> metals were present . Mr . Pierson subsequently mentioned that the <br /> NPDES permit would likely contain stringent ( low) limits for metals <br /> as well as for the organic compounds . The subject of the Fish and <br /> Game Department' s involvement in the permitting process was <br /> discussed. Wayne said that Fish and Game would have an opportunity <br /> to comment on the remediation project during the NPDES permit <br /> review process . <br /> 3 . Capture Zone Analysis : Bill Marshall asked if EMCON had done a <br /> capture zone analysis as part of their -work on the Remediation <br /> Project . J . C. Isham ( EMCON) said although EMCON did not do <br /> groundwater modeling, they did do a capture zone study which showed <br /> the pumping cone of dispression would encompas's the width of the <br /> plume at the downgradient edge of the landfill . Mr . Marshall said <br /> that the arithmetic approach used to predict the capture zone was <br /> acceptable and that confirmation of the capture zone would be based <br /> on future ground-water monitoring. <br /> 4 . Landfill Gas ( LFG) Condensate Disposal : Tim Christ (CIWMB) said <br /> the new Federal landfill regulations prohibit return of LFG <br /> condensate to landfills starting in 1993 . Tim said his agency would <br /> like to see progress made toward eliminating return of LFG <br /> condensate at Austin Road landfill . The City of Stockton informed <br /> Mr . Christ that an addendum to the NPDES permit was being prepared <br /> to allow for future treatment of the condensate using the ground- <br /> water treatment system. However, implementation of condensate <br /> treatment would not occur in the near future . Rather,_.that Pacific <br />