Laserfiche WebLink
release. The initial investigation included soil boring and ground water quality testing along <br />the upgradient and downgradient edges of the landfill. The results of the borings along the <br />downgradient edge of the landfill showed that the water quality in the upper two water zones <br />has been impacted. It was determined that the upper two water zones are interconnected, or <br />essentially one continuous zone. Further investigation will include off-site exploration for <br />determination of the horizontal extent of the release, and an evaluation of the third water zone <br />to determine if it has also been impacted. <br />A verification (evaluation) monitoring program was implemented in three phases to determine <br />the vertical and horizontal extent of contamination. Phases I and II confirmed VOC impact <br />along the entire downgradient edge of the landfill and in the first encountered water bearing <br />zone. In April 1991, Phase III indicated the chlorinated hydrocarbon impacted ground water <br />extends laterally as far as 1.000 feet downgradient of the edge of the landfill and that the <br />second water bearing zone beneath the landfill did not appear to have been impacted. <br />The extent of the contamination is suspected to be extended by a recent finding of VOC <br />contamination in an agricultural well located on CYA property adjacent to Austin Road <br />approximately 3,750 feet downgradient of the landfill. <br />A Conceptual Corrective Action Plan was proposed by the Discharger on 24 April 1991 to <br />address the chlorinated hydrocarbon impact to ground water. The plan was approved by the <br />Board on 10 June 1991. A Corrective Action Plan dated 29 August 1991 was prepared <br />consistent with the Conceptual Corrective Action Plan and involves the following actions: 1) <br />reduction of leaching of chlorinated hydrocarbons into the ground water by checking <br />incoming loads into the landfill for hazardous materials and implementing measures to reduce <br />storm -water infiltration into the refuse; 2) extract ground water from the two existing <br />extraction wells to reduce the off-site migration of chlorinated hydrocarbons;, 3) instaff a <br />system for treating the extracted ground water prior to discharge; and 4) monitor the <br />effectiveness of the corrective action and potential need for modifications. <br />Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 92-143. NPDES No. CA0082911. for the Ground <br />Water Treatment System and Storm Water Discharge was adopted by the Board on 14 August <br />1992. <br />The Discharger submitted an Effluent and Receiving Water Quality Assessment Report <br />ERWQA ) dated 22 October 1993 to determine If the proposed discharge from the ground <br />water treatment system would have any impacts on the receiving water quality and, if <br />necessary, develop a plan to mitigate the impacts. The ground water treatment system is <br />designed to treat approximately 305 gallons per minute (gpm). which will be discharged to <br />the north branch of the south fork of Littlejohn Creek. The Report indicates that the <br />discharge from the ground water treatment system would have no impacts on the receiving <br />water. Littleiohns Creek. <br />