COMPLIANCE INFO_1991-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

7) Page 7; stockpiling, plan to store excavated soil, plan says "most", what will be done with the rest? 8) Page 8; map scales are not correct for P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4, and P-5. 9) Page 8; Fill sequencing, P-3, drawing scale 1" = 4001, map detail and numbers are unclear, provide a more appropriate scale, (at least 1" = 2001). 10) Page 8; show degree of slope between benches (pg 3.1-23 PDM) on map P-1. 11) Page 8; P-3, maps are to small to see detail, provide maps of appropriate size and scale. 12) Page 8; leachate collection detail shown on P-6, not P- 7. Correct. 13) Page 8; Gas management plan, not given as required (pg 3.1-26, PDM). Provide. 14) Page 5; Appendix E, 11 ... additional geotechnical investigation work to be conducted prior to final design of the vertical expansion...", Make this statement in the table, up front. 15) Page 10; seismic stability not required? explain. 16) Page 11; settlement analysis calls for further studies, Appendix E pg S. How can approval be given on future study to proceed on unknown facts for the vertical lift in the final phase? 17) Page 11; climatological data used for "leachate model" is 20 years old, 1974-1978. More current information should be used. Last year and this year water was above the access roads, and in contact with toe of landfill. In addition current drainage system does not move run-off away from landfill. Will this be the case in the expansion? What steps will be taken to correct current and future problems? 18) Page 13; describe the responsibilities of each supervisor (14 CCR 17673; pg. 3.1-33 PDM). 19) Page 13; List equipment by type, capacity and numbers (14 CCR 17693, pg. 3.1-34 PDM). 20) Page 13; stand-by equipment, provide a list of firms or agencies which can supply replacement units (14 CCR 17694; pg 3.1-35 PDM), provide names, phone #'s,