Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. G. Arnold Inouye <br />August 3, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />In the June 27, 1995 letter we said that we were going ahead with the MW -14 <br />installation .and sampling in our continuing effort to track movement of the plume. <br />Present Situation <br />We installed MW -14 and sampled it on July 11, 1995. Only a "trace" amount of <br />Acetone was found in the MW -14 sample (see attached EPA Method 8260 test results). <br />Acetone is not one of the VOC-constituents present in the landfill plume. This means <br />that the landfill plume has not reached MW -14. As the attached State parcel map <br />indicates MW -14 is located in the south east comer of State Surplus Parcel No. SSL <br />357-3. The plume has not reached the City's other monitoring well on State Surplus <br />Parcel No. SSL 357-3, MW -12, either since monitoring results show no evidence of <br />VOC-constituents in this well. MW -12 is located in the south west comer of State <br />Surplus Parcel No. SSL 357-3. <br />With two "clean" wells at both ends of the southern boundary of State Surplus Parcel <br />No. SSL 357-3 we believe that the landfill plume has not impacted the State <br />agricultural well and State Surplus Parcel No. SSL 357-3. <br />We will continue to monitor MW -12, �lW- 13, and MW -14 as part of our quarterly <br />monitoring program and keep you updated on any further developments. <br />SC/MM <br />cc: Dwane Milnes, City Manager <br />Gary Ingraham, Assistant City Manager <br />James B. Giottonini, Public Works Director <br />-Bart Thfltgen, Deputy City Attorney <br />Elden E. Fillion, State Office of Real Estate and Design Service <br />Jerry Noma, Northern California Youth Center <br />J.C. Isham, EMCON <br />