My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1991-1997
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1991-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2021 10:53:56 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1991-1997
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sfrench
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1991-1996.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
700
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO CITY OF STOCKTON <br />DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />CITY HALL <br />425 N. EL DORADO STREET <br />STOCKTON, CA S5202-1997 <br />August 29, 1994 <br />Mr. William J. Marshall, Chief - Chapter 15 unit <br />California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br />Central Valley Region <br />3443 Routier Road, Suite A <br />Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 <br />We received your August 17 letter telling us that volatile organic compounds (VOCs) <br />typical of the Austin Road Landfill VOCs plume were found in NCYC's agricultural <br />supply well located 3,000 feet downgradient from the landfill. You asked that we resample <br />that well and the two private supply wells at 7890 and 8160 -Austin Road for the presence <br />of VOCs. You also asked that we provide field sampling and laboratory analysis <br />documentation with the test results. <br />The City is very concerned about the NCYC well test results and the allegations the State <br />Office of Real Estate and Design Services has made concerning those results. We can assure <br />you that the City intends to fully cooperate with the Regional Board in clarifying this <br />issue. However, before spending public funds, which are in short supply during the current <br />fiscal crisis, we must obtain and evaluate additional information about the conditions of <br />this well when it was sampled, the procedures followed in collecting the sample, and the <br />laboratory analysis quality control procedures. We are especially interested in getting this <br />information since learning that the well is unsecured and apparently had oil in it when it <br />was sampled (see attached correspondence). <br />We, specifically, would like to know the following: <br />1. Was the depth to water measured in the well before sampling and was the <br />grbundwater elevation calculated ? If so, what was it ? <br />a. How many samples were taken, and what were the results of samples not <br />I'SC., - -APORT" <br />!-,. r r-37- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.