Laserfiche WebLink
am M a Mao M M M MM M W <br /> TABLE S.1: SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Continued) <br /> Environmental Impact Mitigation Measure Level of Significance After Mitigation <br /> B. Visual and Aesthetics(Cont.) <br /> B.2. Realignment of the Little Johns Creek would None warranted <br /> impair the view. (ADVERSE) <br /> 13.3. The proposed project would generate additional (a) A 6-foot chain link fence would be constructed Less than Significant <br /> sources-of light and glare in the project site. at the perimeter of the facility so that public <br /> (ADVERSE) access(and access to these views)would be <br /> limited. <br /> (b) The facility would continue to operate only <br /> during daylight hours so that excessive amounts <br /> of light would not be generated by the project. <br /> (c) The use of highly reflective surface materials in <br /> constructing structures on the site should be <br /> restricted. Exterior building materials should be <br /> painted or otherwise treated with muted earth- <br /> tone colors. <br /> BA The proposed project could result in an increase (a) Refuse would be compacted and covered as soon Less than Significant <br /> of debris and litter along access roads and at the as possible after deposition to reduce amounts of <br /> site during transporting and handling of blowing litter. <br /> material. (SIGNIFICANT) <br /> (b) Portable litter control fences would be <br /> strategically placed to reduce the amount of <br /> blowing litter. <br /> (c) The working face would be oriented to the <br /> downward side of prevailing winds to help <br /> reduce litter. <br /> (d) Periodic inspections would be conducted to <br /> collect and contain litter on-and off-site. <br /> S.9 <br />