My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1996-2003
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1996-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2021 8:55:58 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1996-2003
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sfrench
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1996-2003.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
623
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Austin Road Landfill Explion Project EIR Comments and Responses* <br /> P.Lettertuber 16,IM Latter <br /> Response to Comment 1: The comment is noted. Swainson's hawks issues are addressed on pp. 82-84 <br /> of the DSEIR. <br /> Response to Comment 2: The requirement for a Streambed Alteration Agreement is acknowledged and <br /> described on p. 80 of the DSEIR. For clarity,the first sentence of the 4h full paragraph on that page has <br /> been revised to read: <br /> "Execution of a Section 1603 Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFG wAy would be required <br /> for relocation of this drainage prior to initiation of any on-site modification." <br /> As described on the top of p. 81 of the DSEIR,the project would not result in a net loss of stream or <br /> riparian habitat. Protection of on-sites and riparian fish and wildlife resources is discussed in <br /> impacts/mitigations F-1,F-8,F-9,F-10,F-11,F-12,and F-13. Stream and wetland buffers are included in <br /> the proposed Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan,as described on pp. 81 and 82 of the DSEIR. <br /> Treatment of construction materials to avoid deposition in streams and wetlands is addressed in <br /> Mitigations K-3 and K-4,on DSEIR p.28 . Additional surface water quality mitigations are provided in <br /> Mitigations K-7 and K-8 (DSEIR pp.29-30). DSEIR Appendix D,"Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring <br /> Plan",describes the proposed planting plan and success criteria. These appear to be less stringent than <br /> those required by CDFG and would need to modified to meet CDFG's requested criteria. In order to <br /> assure compliance with CDFG revegetation survival and cover criteria,the following mitigation measure <br /> has been added to the end of Mitigation F.1,on p. 81 of the DSEIR. <br /> "(c) Restoration of the riparian area shall include revegetation with trees, shrubs, and grasses <br /> native to the area Plantings shall have a minimum 80%survival after the first year, and 100% <br /> survival thereafter, or shall have attained a 75%cover after three years and a 90%cover after <br /> five years. Plantings shall be monitored each year and maintained as necessary until success <br /> criteria have been met. In order to assure iplementation, the Wetlands Mitigation and <br /> Monitoring Plan shall be modified to include these criteria." <br /> Response to Comment 3: Comment noted. The project developer would pay the required fees and <br /> comply with notification requirements as specified in the comment. <br /> 47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.