My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1996_2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1996_2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:09 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:40:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1996_2
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1996_2.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
465
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FA <br />1,; <br />Section 1 <br />Revision 1 II <br />Date: January 15, 1994 . <br />Page: 1 of 18 <br />Internal <br />requiresAn internal quality control program of routineinternal <br />that the ta <br />1 generated 1111 a measurement system meetsprescribedcriteria quality. <br />ata <br />An effective internal QC program must be capable of measuring and controlling the quality of <br />the data, in terms of precision, accuracy, and completeness (see sections 5 and 14 for these <br />r <br />This section identifies ,.:: protocols \ r <br />ciated with analytical procedures. Table 11-1 is a <br />general outline 1 quality1 r'. 1 parametersmonitored 1 <br />1 procedure. <br />specificcontrol provide <br />general quality control measures as well as <br />1 <br />continualf f andassessment <br />through FIgures 11-1 <br />FGL Control Charts. <br />FGL uses continuing calibration verifications (C and initial 6fibration verification (ICV) <br />for instrument quality control. The laboratory control sample (LCS) is used for sample <br />preparation quality control. 71be CCV standard only verifies continuing calibration. The ICV <br />standard is used to independently verify the calibration and may take the place of CCV when <br />used on a continuing basis during analysis. The LCS may take the place of both ICV and <br />CCV when prepared independently and used on a continuing basis during analysis. <br />11.1 Quality Control Parameters <br />11.1.1 Initial Demonstration of Capability <br />Before analyzing samples, the laboratory must prove proficiency in the method by <br />preparing a data package for certification. The laboratory normally provides the <br />following information: <br />calibration data <br />calibration n from an independentsource <br />methoddetection 11 data <br />4) detection limit verification data <br />accuracy and precision data <br />These must all be acceptable under the method QC criteria or, when requirements <br />am not specified, reasonably meet good laboratory practices and Department of <br />Health Services requirements. <br />11.12 Analysis Quality Controls <br />11.1.2.1 Instrument Blank <br />The instrument or calibration blank is used to calibrate the instrument. This <br />blank contains the same reagents used in the standards and samples. However, <br />the blank is prepared under controlled conditions and is not processed like all <br />samples. <br />IM <br />11.1.2.2 Detection I;imft Standard (DIS) <br />Normally, method detection limits Ls) are performed on an annual basis. <br />However, this doesn't adequately refl the day -today variations in the <br />analysis. FGL has taken a different approach. We perform what we call <br />detection limit standards on a daily basis. This gives more "representative" <br />method detection limits. Tracking the DLS using our IjMS allows us to monitor <br />instrument and method performance. Historically, we can also prove what our <br />L was at a particular time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.