My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1997-2000
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1997-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 9:51:55 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:40:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1997-2000
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1998.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CALIFORNIA REGIONATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br />CENTRAL VALLEY RE N <br />3443 Routier Road, Suite A <br />Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 <br />Phone (916) 255-3000 <br />FAX (916) 255-3015 <br />16 October 1997 <br />Mr. Stephen Chen <br />Department of Public Works <br />City of Stockton <br />425 N. El Dorado Street <br />Stockton, CA 95202-1997 <br />nt1�i�� <br />Pete`Wilson, Governor <br />We have reviewed the work plan submitted by Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) for additional <br />groundwater investigation and corrective actions at the Austin Road Landfill. The report satisfies our <br />7 March 1997 request for an amended report of waste discharge due to confirmed VOC detections in <br />certain monitoring wells. The general approach outlined in the workplan is appropriate, but a few <br />clarifications are necessary. <br />The location of Transect 1 is intended to define the northern boundary of the plume. The influence of <br />NCYA supply wells on the plume is unknown and we believe it is important to know where the plume is <br />relative to these wells. Unless CDM is certain that Transect 1 in combination with their other studies <br />will yield this information, we suggest that the transect location be shifted to the west or another transect <br />added to better delineate the western portion of the northern edge of the plume. <br />The discussion of Hydropunch sampling explains that water samples will generally be collected from the <br />upper and lower aquifers in each boring. In the previous investigation, samples from the upper aquifer <br />were collected near the water table surface which at that time was commonly above the sandy portion of <br />the aquifer. This sampling strategy left open the possibility that VOCs could have migrated farther in the <br />deeper, coarser portion of the upper aquifer. CDM needs to address this issue in their sampling plan. <br />Finally, CDM notes that well head treatment or alternative water supplies could be used to protect local <br />groundwater consumers. We concur that such options could be important, but note that they would not <br />relieve the City of its responsibility under Title 27 and State Board Policy 92-49 to clean up pollutants in <br />the aquifer. <br />Recycled Paper Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources, and <br />ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.