My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2000
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:20 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:41:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2000
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440004_6484 N WAVERLY_2000.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
nonparametric tolerance limit method. However, this method requires a large number of samples to <br /> achieve a false positive rate of 1 percent or less,which is required by CCR Title 23, Chapter 15, <br /> Article 5 guidelines. Thus,when the alpha level was higher than 1 percent,the concentration limit <br /> was not established and data was compared to established limits in the Waste Discharge <br /> Requirements. <br /> Nonstatistical Approach <br /> When the background data set contains 100 percent nondetect values, Sanitas applies the <br /> nonstatistical approach. This approach takes into consideration that if historically a constituent has <br /> not been detected, any detection of that constituent would be considered an exceedence. Thus, in <br /> these situations (100 percent nondetected values),the tolerance limit is set at"detect",meaning that <br /> if a value is detected above its method detection limit, this value is an exceedance of the <br /> concentration limit. <br /> Intrawell Rank Sum <br /> When Intrawell Tolerance Limit analysis is unable to normalize the data and thus a nonparametric <br /> analysis is performed, the false positive rate becomes greater than five percent. When this happens <br /> the data is compared to the concentration limit listed in the WDRs, if any. In addition, an Intrawell <br /> Rank Sum analysis is performed. This is a nonparametric procedure where the sums of ranked data <br /> sets are compared. Subsequent sample data are compared with sampling data from the initial <br /> monitoring period of the same well. It is assumed that during the initial monitoring period the well <br /> has shown no evidence of contamination nor an increasing trend. This test procedure is used to <br /> evaluate whether the historical (background data) and the compliance data have the same median <br /> constituent concentration. <br /> Trend Analysis <br /> Sen's Slope measures the change in constituent concentrations per unit time. Sen's method is not <br /> greatly affected by outliers, and the slope can be computed when data are missing. Sen's estimator <br /> is closely related to the Mann-Kendall test,which is a nonparametric rank correlation test for trend. <br /> The test uses only the relative magnitudes of the data rather than their actual values;therefore, <br /> missing values are allowed. Sen's Slope and the Mann-Kendall tests are described in"Statistical <br /> Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring,"Richard O. Gilbert,Van Nostrand Reinhold, <br /> New York, 1987. The Mann-Kendall test is recommended in"An Evaluation of Trend Detection <br /> Techniques for Use in Water Quality Monitoring Programs,"Jim Loflis, et al., (USEPA), 1989. <br /> Only data detected at least four times above its PQL are evaluated. Trace values used are the <br /> estimated values from the certified analytical reports. A trend analysis was conducted only on data <br /> collected from the point data was detected above the PQL. For the Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill, <br /> the null hypothesis is"no statistically significant trend in constituent concentrations." The null <br /> hypothesis was rejected if trends in the monitoring data were significant at alpha=0.05,which is the <br /> probability of rejecting the null hypothesis of no trend when it is true (i.e. a Type 1 error). The <br /> County uses Sanitas to calculate both the Sen's Slope and the Mann-Kendall test for trends. <br /> Corral Hollow Landfill D-2 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 4T"Qtr/Annual 2003 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin-January 28,2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.