Laserfiche WebLink
Vadose Zone Soil Gas <br /> Soil gasses were sampled on March 13, 2007. Samples were collected by first measuring the methane <br /> content using a CES-LANDTEC GEMTM 500 portable gas analyzer. The GEMTM 500 was operated until a <br /> steady-state gas composition indicated that the well was purged. After purging, gas samples were collected <br /> in 6-liter Summa canisters and sent to Atmospheric Analysis & Consulting, Inc. for analysis by EPA method <br /> TO-14A. <br /> First Semester Results <br /> VOCs were detected in all soil gas samples (Table 6). The highest concentration of any VOC was found in <br /> SG-l. Freon 12 was most often reported with the highest concentration in a sample. The most VOCs (ten) <br /> were reported in SG-10. <br /> ' 1 <br /> Methane concentrations were 0 percent in all the wells except for 0. percent in SG 1 and 10.8 percent in <br /> SG-11. <br /> Continuing detection of VOCs in soil gas since monitoring began in October 2003 with lack of impact by <br /> VOCs to groundwater at any well since February 2002 indicates that the presence of VOCs at these <br /> concentrations is a benign condition at this landfill. <br /> GROUNDWATER DIRECTION AND FLOW RATE <br /> Groundwater elevations were measured in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2R, and MW-3 during the first and <br /> second quarters. Groundwater was determined to flow towards the southwest(Figures 3 and 4). The <br /> calculated average linear groundwater flow velocity in the first quarter was 63.96 feet per year based on a <br /> hydraulic gradient of 0.0019 foot per foot. The calculated average linear groundwater flow velocity in the <br /> 1 second quarter was 53.86 feet per year based on a hydraulic gradient of 0.0016 foot per foot. These <br /> calculations can be found in Appendix G. <br /> STANDARD OBSERVATIONS <br /> Regular site inspections were performed during the first semester of 2007. Monthly standard observations <br /> 1 have been summarized(Appendix H). The electronic signatures on the forms certify that all observations <br /> were performed and are accurate. <br /> RUN-OFF/RUN-ON FACILITIES <br /> The Foothill Sanitary Landfill utilizes several methods to control run-on and run-off. The natural <br /> topography of the area controls any run-on into the site. Also, the working area is a significant distance from <br /> the property boundary, so run-on from surrounding properties is minimal. <br /> ' To control run-off, a perimeter ditch along the north, west and east ends of the unit directs all storm water <br /> run-off into a sedimentation basin on the east side of the site. The rest of the run-off from the unit gathers <br /> into a sedimentation basin at the southeast corner of Module 1. There were no breeches to any of the run- <br /> on/run-off facilities during this monitoring period. <br /> Foothill Sanitary landfill 9 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 1s'Semester Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—July 31,2007 <br />