Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> Above the water bearing zone, the soil layers are moderately to well-cemented layers of sandstone and <br /> siltstone with claystone and conglomerates. This soil is mostly moderately slow in permeability with <br /> sporadic sandy layers that are well drained. <br /> Construction <br /> Module"I" is an unlined module covering approximately 80 acres. <br /> Module 1 includes approximately 34 acres of composite liner. This module was completed in December <br /> 2003. The liner system of Module 1 and future modules consists of(from top to bottom): <br /> • 2-foot-thick soil operations layer <br /> • 8 oz/synthetic nonwoven geotextile separator/filter <br /> • Drainage layer: <br /> - Base: 0.75-foot-thick gravel drainage layer with leachate collection troughs with <br /> 4-inch-diameter piping <br /> - Side slopes: geocomposite drain layer with nonwoven geotextile separator/filter <br /> 60-mil HDPE geomembrane <br /> • Geosynthetic clay liner(GCL) on prepared surface <br /> • 1-foot thick prepared subgrade(base only). <br /> COMPLIANCE HISTORY SUMMARY <br /> Prior to March 2000, the landfill was found not to impact groundwater. From March 2000 to October 2001, <br /> volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were consistently and repeatedly detected at groundwater monitoring <br /> well W-3. These detections have been ascribed to ponding along a road on refuse immediately adjacent to <br /> that monitoring well during the winters of 1995/1996, 1996/1997, and 1997/1998. Impact to groundwater at <br /> other wells was not indicated. <br /> In the spring of 1998, ponding was corrected by covering with refuse and grading. However, penetration of <br /> water into the refuse below the ponding area apparently caused an increase in landfill gas (LFG)production <br /> in the years after ponding was corrected, sufficient to impact the groundwater. Correction of the ponding has <br /> since allowed the LFG production to dissipate, and groundwater contamination has not been confirmed in <br /> MW-3 since October 2002. Contamination has not been confirmed at other groundwater monitoring wells at <br /> any time. <br /> In February 2002 water samples from MW-3 indicated that impact to groundwater had ceased. Except for <br /> "false positive"detections due to laboratory contamination, impact to groundwater has not been indicated at <br /> this well since that time. Groundwater impact at the other wells by VOCs has not been indicated since the <br /> wells were installed. <br /> On November 6, 2002, the County submitted an Evaluation Monitoring Plan proposing methods to delineate <br /> the nature and extent of groundwater impact seen at MW-3. The Plan included drilling and sampling from <br /> temporary borings, and a step-out step-down approach if groundwater contamination was detected at those <br /> borings. <br /> On January 30, 2003, WDRs were issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central <br /> Valley Region (CVRWQCB). These WDRs required the closure of Module"P' as corrective action because <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill 4 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> lot Semester Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—July 31,2007 <br />