Laserfiche WebLink
Leachate System Monitoring and Maintenance <br /> The flow rate provided by the sump pump is tested at least monthly. If no other causes are apparent, a <br /> decrease in pumping rate will indicate the need to clean a filter or to investigate pump wear. <br /> Leachate production rate is greater in the late winter and spring, compared to summer and autumn,because <br /> little or no rain falls on the site from April to November of each year. <br /> The secondary leachate sump is monitored monthly for the presence of LFG condensate. If possible,this <br /> condensate is removed, and if removed,the volume is recorded. <br /> Landfill Gas Condensate Removal from Module 1 Secondary Sump <br /> Investigations by the County indicated that the landfill gas condensate accidentally delivered to the <br /> secondary sump of Module 1 was forced into the anchor trench a few feet below the ground surface along the <br /> edge of the secondary sump liner. <br /> Removal of LFG condensate remaining in the secondary sump began in April 2009, and now continues <br /> monthly concurrent with landfill inspection. <br /> Monitoring of condensate removal includes measuring the depth of condensate in the secondary sump before <br /> and after pumping, and measuring the volume of condensate withdrawn during pumping. The depth of <br /> condensate in the secondary sump is measured by a bubbler tube installed into the sump. <br /> Condensate is removed from the secondary sump by a centrifugal pump installed in the sump. The volume <br /> of condensate removed is measured by measuring the time of pumping,having establishing that the pumping <br /> rate is 10 gallons per minute. The pump is allowed to run until lack of liquid causes the pump safety features <br /> to stop the pump. Liquid removed from the secondary sump is delivered to the landfill surface over the lined <br /> area of Module 1. <br /> After the initial removal event of mid April,withdrawal of condensate continues to decrease from an initial <br /> 27 gallons per day in late April to approximately 0.3 gallons per day. However,this collection rate remained <br /> constant, rather than decreasing as expected. This observation,together with observations during a high- <br /> level event in the primary sump in March 2011 indicates a hydraulic connection between the primary and <br /> secondary sump. The County has proposed to install permanent pumping capability in the secondary sump <br /> to ensure that the hydraulic head in the secondary sump does not exceed 12 inches. <br /> HISTORICAL TIME SERIES PLOTS <br /> Constituents not detected are plotted at a value of half their respective detection limits in the Historical Time <br /> Series Plots (Appendix F). Outliers were included in the plots as directed by RWQCB staff. <br /> PROGRESS OF EVAPOTRANSPIRATION COVER <br /> The purpose of the evapotranspiration cover is to capture rain water during the wet months, allowing the <br /> vegetation growing on that cover to remove the water from the soil during the dry months,restoring the <br /> storage capacity of the soil for the next rainy season. Providing storage for rainwater each year prevents the <br /> percolation of water into the refuse. The intention of this closure method is to minimize water percolating <br /> into the refuse at least as effectively as the prescriptive barrier layer(one foot thick with permeability of 10-6 <br /> cm/sec or less). <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill 12 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> I"Semester 2011 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—July 31,2011 <br />