Laserfiche WebLink
As-Built CQA Report for the Construction of Area 2A at the Foothill Sanitary Landfill <br /> San Joaquin County,California <br /> • Trial Seam Testing <br /> Prior to the start of seaming operations and after the mid-day break, GBE performed trial seam <br /> welds on all seaming equipment to verify the performance of welding equipment, seaming <br /> methods, and conditions. The trial seams were made from a piece of the HDPE geomembrane and <br /> were seamed together under the same conditions as the actual field seaming. The HDPE <br /> geomembrane trial seams were tested for peel adhesion (peel) and bonded seam strength (shear), <br /> and were required to fail in the geomembrane sheet, as characterized by the film tear bond (FTB) <br /> and not in the welded seam segment (non-FTB). For all seaming equipment, a minimum of four, <br /> one-inch-wide test specimens were obtained from each trial seam. Two of the specimens were <br /> tested for peel and two specimens were tested for shear. For the dual-track hot-wedge fusion <br /> seaming method, both sides of the seam specimens were tested for peel adhesion. The results of <br /> fusion and extrusion trial seams are presented in Appendix I. <br /> AES CQA Monitors monitored the seaming conditions including ambient temperature, sheet <br /> overlap, and seam preparation. In addition, the CQA Monitors marked samples for destructive <br /> seam tests and located defects on the HDPE geomembrane seams and liner. Summary of fusion and <br /> extrusion seam construction and non-destructive testing for the geomembrane is presented in <br /> Appendix J. The specified minimum values for shear and peel for 60-mil fusion and extrusion <br /> welded seams were as follows: <br /> • Pro <br /> perty Unit Test Method Specification <br /> Shear Strength Fusion Extrusion i ASTM D6392 120 <br /> Peel Strength-Fusion ppi ASTM D6392 91 <br /> Peel Strength-Extrusion ppi ASTM D6392 78 <br /> Repairs <br /> During installation of the HDPE geomembrane, a number of locations required repairs to the liner. <br /> These included seam T-intersections, penetration in the liner system resulting from leachate <br /> extraction riser pipes, cuts for destructive test sampling, cuts placed in the liner to perform <br /> pressure testing, construction damage, leaks found during vacuum testing or air-pressure testing, <br /> or areas left unseamed. The majority of these defects resulted from the normal course of <br /> geomembrane installation. Each defect was identified, and GBE repaired all defects to the HDPE <br /> geomembrane and welded the seams by extrusion or fusion welding methods as described above. <br /> Appendix K presents a summary of the defects including locations, repair dates and non-destructive <br /> testing dates. <br /> Non Destructive Seam Testine <br /> GBE performed non-destructive seam continuity testing as seaming of 60-mil HDPE geomembrane <br /> progressed, by using air-pressure testing on dual-track hot-wedge fusion seams, vacuum box <br /> PA14 Projects114-101(SJCDPW North County and Foothillff oothill CQAIRepoffinal ReportToothill CQA Rport-Final.docx <br /> 26 <br />