Laserfiche WebLink
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM <br />Page 9 <br />�. June 3, 1992 <br />SAC31583.AC.ZZ <br />sections, CS -A and CS -B, are shown in Figure 1. Profile views of these two sections are <br />shown in Appendix III. Cross sections taken through the maximum refuse height <br />(approximately 200 feet) and through the North Sedimentation Basin located between the <br />proposed toe of landfill and the South Fork. This first section was selected because it is at <br />the expected location of greatest refuse fill height and it crosses the North Sedimentation <br />Basin, the deepest proposed permanent excavation near the toe of the proposed landfill <br />extension (21 -foot deep excavation). Section CS -B, the second section analyzed, was <br />selected because it crosses an existing ash disposal pit, which is lined with a compacted clay <br />liner founded at approximate elevation 15 feet, and also crosses the South Fork at the <br />expected location of greatest refuse fill height. No section was analyzed for the portion of <br />the proposed landfill extension south of the South Fork because soil conditions in that area <br />are similar to subsurface conditions near Sections CS -A and CS -B, and because the proposed <br />maximum refuse height in that area is considerably less (approximately 120 feet). <br />For the two cross sections described above, various potential shear surfaces were analyzed to <br />determine the "most critical' surface having the lowest safety factor under static loading <br />conditions. The shapes of potential shear surfaces analyzed included circular arcs and <br />surfaces formed by sliding blocks. Potential shear surfaces analyzed included surfaces <br />entirely within the refuse fill, surfaces passing wholly or partially along interfaces within the <br />proposed lining system underlying the refuse fill (both smooth and textured FML liner was <br />considered), and surfaces passing wholly or partially through the underlying foundation <br />materials. PCSTABLSM cross section plots showing the "most critical" potential shear <br />surfaces analyzed are included in Appendix III. <br />Material Properties <br />Material properties that were used in the stability analyses include shear strengths, friction <br />angles, and unit weights. These properties are based on laboratory test results, SPT blow - <br />counts, and pocket penetrometer test results performed for this exploration. Shear strength <br />test results are summarized in Table II -1, Appendix II, and the SPT blow -counts and pocket <br />penetrometer shear strength test results are shown in the borings logs in Appendix I. <br />Shear strength properties used for refuse fill is based on a review of refuse properties by S. <br />Singh of the Santa Clara University (S. Singh, 1989). Because the proposed landfill <br />extension will accept mainly commercial and industrial waste, less frequent cover material <br />will be required and the density of refuse will therefore be less than the typical unit weight <br />of refuse for municipal solid waste landfill (typically 70 to 80 pounds per cubic foot). For <br />