Laserfiche WebLink
1.4 REGIONAL GROUNDWATER USE <br /> Wells in the area are used primarily to supply water for agricultural and domestic <br /> purposes. Of the facilities in the area, the California Youth Authority and the Northern <br /> California Women's Facility both have wells that are thought to be used to supply <br /> drinking water. Review of Department of Water Resources (DWR) files (Beta <br /> Associates, 1988) indicates that 20 irrigation and domestic wells exist within 1 mile of <br /> the FSL(Table 1; Figure 2). The record review indicates that 9 of these wells are <br /> screened within 65 feet of the ground surface, and that 7 wells are screened below 130 <br /> feet. <br /> Only 6 of the 19 wells are down- or cross-gradient of the FSL (Table 1, Figure 2). Of <br /> these downgradient offsite wells, the nearest well (+ 200 feet) was recently purchased by <br /> Forward Inc., and bottled water is delivered to the tenants of the property. The next <br /> closest wells are approximately '/2-mile north, 1-mile northeast, and 1-mile east (cross- <br /> gradient) of the FSL. <br /> 1.5 MONITORING NETWORK <br /> The monitoring network at the FSL includes 19 groundwater monitoring wells, 12 vadose <br /> zone lysimeters, and 10 perimeter gas monitoring probes (Figure 1). Ten of the <br /> monitoring wells are positioned in well pairs (e.g., MW-1A, MW-1B) to accommodate <br /> fluctuating groundwater elevations in the area. The groundwater monitoring wells were <br /> typically constructed to depths between 70 and 110 feet. Except for the background <br /> lysimeter, which was constructed to a depth of about 10 feet, the lysimeters at the site <br /> were generally constructed to depths of 1 to 2 feet below the base of adjacent landfill <br /> cells. The perimeter gas probes were installed to depths of only approximately 5 feet. <br /> The two nearest offsite wells at 9621 and 9690 S. Austin Road are also monitored <br /> regularly. <br /> 2.0 VC IMPACTS <br /> 2.1 GROUNDWATER <br /> iVOCs have been detected sporadically, and at low concentrations, in monitoring well <br /> samples at the site since groundwater monitoring began in 1987. Before their <br /> abandonment in 1993, VOCs were most commonly detected in monitoring wells MW-5A <br /> and MW-513, near the southern border of U-B (Figure 1). Since then, VOCs have <br /> been most commonly detected at the northeast corner of the property, near the <br /> downgradient limits of the facility. <br /> As listed below, other than acetone and methylene chloride (common laboratory <br /> contaminants), VOCs were detected in samples from 8 monitoring wells during 1999 and <br /> 2000. VOCs were most commonly detected at trace levels (between the laboratory <br /> method detection limit [MDL] and practical quantitation limit [PQL]) and in samples <br /> 3 <br /> Geologic Associates <br />