My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2001_2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2001_2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:22 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:48:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2001_2
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2001_2.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
853
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br />U <br />TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM <br />Page 14 <br />June 3, 1992 <br />SAC31583.AC.ZZ <br />A key -assumption used to estimate foundation settlement was that similar material types will <br />exhibit similar consolidation properties throughout the landfill area. Data obtained during <br />the subsurface exploration, however, indicated that the clay layers in which consolidation <br />tests were performed exhibited wide variations in density. Accordingly, because the <br />consolidation tests were performed on relatively compressible samples and relatively stiffer <br />clay zones occur at various depths, the foundation settlement estimates presented are likely <br />conservative. Also, since no geotechnical subsurface information (SPT blow -counts or shear <br />strength) was available for depths greater than lib feet, an approximate, order-o&niagnitiWe <br />settlement estimate was made using an elastic theory approach. Actual foundation: <br />settlement values measured in the field may therefore vary from the values reported, in this <br />technical memorandum. <br />Because of the anticipated landfill extension refuse loads, it is estimated that foundation <br />settlement in the clay layers will consist of both recompression settlement and virgin <br />compression settlement. A summary of the consolidation properties used in the analysis are <br />presented in Table 3. <br />Table 3 <br />Summary of Consolidation Test Results used in Foundation Settlement Analysis <br />Boring <br />No. <br />Sampic <br />Depth <br />(tt) <br />soil <br />I'pe <br />(USCS) <br />Slope of <br />Recompression <br />Curve (C,) <br />Slope of Preconsolidation <br />Compression Pressure <br />Curve (CJ (psi) <br />Overconsolidation <br />Ratio <br />(OCR) <br />1114-.1. _ <br />33.0-355 <br />ML <br />0.01 <br />0.10 14,000 <br />3 <br />BH -1 <br />76.0-785 <br />CL <br />0.02 <br />0.14 16,000 <br />1.7 <br />131-1-2 <br />48.0-50-5 <br />CL <br />0.03 <br />0.13 81000 <br />1:4 <br />The OCRs shown in Table 3 were determined- based on the original groundsurface contour <br />and estimated groundwater table elevation at the time of drilling. <br />Results of Analyses <br />The greatest magnitude of total foundation settlement is anticipated to occur in the area of <br />maximum refuse height, in the area near Boring BH -1. Total settlement at this, location is <br />estimated to be up to 2 feet. Foundation settlement for interim fill conditions will be <br />smaller than this estimated settlement. Subsurface material encountered during our <br />exploration was typically very sandy, and the clay material that was encountered was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.