Laserfiche WebLink
applied to the entire landfill surface. However, consideration should be given to developing <br />soil stockpiles on the existing landfill during the operation of the landfill expansion to provide <br />for preloading consolidation. Also, dynamic compaction should be considered in local areas <br />where the effects of settlement many be more critical such as along leachate collection, trench <br />alignments. <br />5.0 SETTLEMENT OF HORIZONTAL EXPANSION LINER SUBGRADE <br />The final analysis concerns the potential settlement of the geologic subgrade underlying the <br />horizontal expansion (Phases I - IV) landfill areas.. The underlying geology of the landfill <br />generally consists of lenticular units composed of clay, silt, and sand with minor amounts of <br />gravel. The lenses range from a few inches to approximately 20 feet in thickness. The field <br />investigation soil report by Twining Laboratories, Inc. for the Austin Road La dfill,,.October 24, <br />1991, showed four soil borings in the area of Phases I, II, and III. Each of these borings shows. a <br />layer of lean clay starting approximately 10 to 15 feet below the surface. Deeper soil boring and <br />monitoring wells in the area of the vertical expansion show 4enses of silty clay, < , ,anti,4Wn.ar <br />amounts of clay. Because the subsurface data is inconclusive on the nature of the geology <br />below the horizontal expansion phases, the following assump'tlons were mazie„to.-mvdel.,the <br />potential settlement of the horizontal expansion landfill liner. <br />■ The subsurface geology below the liner is assumed to consist of a 10 -foot clay layer <br />underlain by a 30 -foot silty clay layer. <br />qW <br />■ Primary consolidation coefficient (Cc) was"estimated"from the liquid•lirmit (LL),index <br />for the clay and silty clay. Cc for the clay layer was 0.22, Cc for the silty clay was <br />0.09. <br />�j <br />■ Critical area of analysis was ass umed°"tote`the'°leachate collection trench aligiv,nent <br />because of the 1% design drainage slope. <br />■ In-place refuse/daily cover density was assumed to be 70 lbs/ft ^ 3 <br />Based on the settlement analysis, up to 1.7 feet of settlement might occur due to subgrade <br />consolidation due to refuse filling through -the -life -of -the, landfill. Final drainagie-.,grades-in the <br />leachate collection trench range from 0.77o' to 0.9% compared to the starting design grade of <br />1%. <br />It should be emphasized that the results are based on rough assumptions concerning the <br />subgrade geology and the consolidation coefficients for the subgrade soil. It is recommended <br />that additional geotechnical field work and settlement analysis be conducted to determine the <br />settlement characteristics of the subgrade prior the final design of the horizontal expansion <br />phases. <br />WW-1811-CAl-AA/3110 Austin Road Landfill Expansion August <br />NU033.DOC Landfill Settlement Page 7 <br />