My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2002 - JTD
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2002 - JTD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2023 12:46:56 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:48:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2002 - JTD
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2002.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
953
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
design for the Forward Landfill, including the geometry of the existing landfill, <br />local climatic conditions (i.e., and environment, low rainfall, high evaporation <br />rate), potential landfill settlement, available cover materials, erosion <br />protection, vegetative growth and proposed end use at closure. It was <br />determined that an alternative final cover design utilizing a monolithic <br />engineered select soil cover is the most appropriate cover system for the <br />Forward Landfill based on these parameters. Approval of alternative cover <br />systems is allowed in 27 CCR, Section 20080(b) in cases where the <br />discharger demonstrates that: <br />(1) The construction of prescriptive standard is not feasible as provided in <br />subsection (c) of Section 20080, and <br />(2) There is a specific engineered alternative that: <br />(A) is consistent with the performance goal addressed by the <br />particular construction or prescriptive standard, and <br />(B) affords equivalent protection against water quality impairment. <br />As stipulated in subsection (c) of Section 20080, to establish that the <br />prescriptive standard is not feasible the discharger must demonstrate that the <br />prescriptive standard: <br />(1) is unreasonably and unnecessarily burdensome and will cost <br />substantially more than alternatives which meet the criteria in <br />subsection (b) of Section 20080; or <br />(2) is impractical and will not promote attainment of applicable <br />performance standards. <br />The proposed alternative final cover design will meet or exceed the <br />prescribed performance criteria and will be more economical for site closure <br />than prescriptive standards. <br />Based on a number of analyses performed for similar sites located in <br />California, it was determined that a three-foot thick final cover section <br />composed of select soil material will meet or exceed the performance criteria <br />of the prescribed standard, a traditional barrier layer is not proposed for the <br />alternative final cover design. Site-specific conditions at the Forward Landfill <br />rendered a performance criteria based on annual surface water infiltration <br />through the proposed alternative final cover. <br />Forward Landfill PFCPCMP 3-3 <br />Z:\PROJECTS\Allied Waste\Forward\Reference Files Prior JTD\June 05 Stage IA Partial FCPCMP\FL-sec3.doc: 6/16/2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.