Laserfiche WebLink
6,680 tons per day (tpd), six days/week and 1,200 tpd, five days/week, respectively, for a total of <br /> 7,880 tpd. The combined tonnage limit stated in the EIR equates to 46,080 tons per week(tpw)for <br /> a seven-day week with a maximum daily tonnage of 8,668 tpd. Historically, these tonnage limits <br /> were considered refuse tonnage limits and the former Forward and Austin Road landfills operated <br /> under this premise. <br /> The basis for this interpretation was California Integrated Waste Management Board's(CIWMB) <br /> LEA Advisory#25 "What Tonnage Amounts Handled on Site Count for Purposes of the Limits in <br /> the Permit"(see Attachment A). LEA Advisory#25 states: "The tonnage counted does not include <br /> material used for daily cover." This Advisory has since been recently rescinded. However, the <br /> C&D regulations promulgated by the CIWMB in 2003, clearly exclude clean soil and rock from <br /> the definition of inert debris. In fact,the Board's"Regulations Implementation Guidance for LEAs <br /> - Questions and Answers: Construction and Demolition and Inert Debris Transfer/Processing <br /> Regulations" (see Attachment B, last updated June 9, 2005) states that: "The CIWMB has <br /> provided no such guidance as it is believed that solid waste statutes, regulations, and supporting <br /> documents clearly indicate that there is no intent to regulate clean soil and rock (emphasis <br /> added" Thus,cover materials have not historically been counted as part of permitted tonnage caps <br /> and as recently as June 2005, the Board has reiterated that clean soils and rock are not materials <br /> regulated by the Board. <br /> The question as to whether the tonnage limits presented in the EIR refer to a refuse tonnage or total <br /> tonnage can be answered based on the various analyses performed in support of the Ea The <br /> environmental analyses for which tonnage is a key factor are transportation and circulation, air <br /> quality,and public health and safety. <br /> In all of the above listed analyses, the site fife/landfill closure date is also a key component of the <br /> analysis. The tonnage limits for the landfill are directly related to the site lifeAandfill closure date. <br /> The following sections provide a discussion of the portions of the Project Description and <br /> environmental analyses that are influenced by tonnage and closure date, as they relate to refuse or <br /> total tonnage assumptions. <br /> CLOSURE DATE IN PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br /> The anticipated closure date for the consolidated Forward Landfill is 2020 (ref: EIR pg. 52). <br /> This closure date is based on calculations presented in the Final Draft Joint Technical <br /> Document. The calculations state that the closure date of 2020 is based on a daily permitted <br /> refuse inflow rate of 7,880 tpd. The amount of daily cover, which includes AD and importe <br /> soi, is a separate qua- ty t tis added to the amount of refuse to estimate the site life/closure <br /> date. If the Forward Landfill's daily tonnage limits were based on a total tonnage, the amount <br /> of refus—e'at could be acre ted at the siteeach a`3 ywou�d3ecrease, resulting in an increase <br /> site life and a closure date beyond 2020. The site life/closure date reference in the Final Draft <br /> Joint Technical Document is included as Attachment C. <br /> TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION <br /> The estimated vehicle count was based on combining the former Forward and Austin Road <br /> Landfill vehicle count limits. The former Forward Landfill was limited to 435 one-way <br /> vehicle trips per day. There was no specified vehicle limit for the former Austin Road <br /> Page 2 <br />