Laserfiche WebLink
'» _..-.�'a""rM,a'!*"+.:�`i,� �+�[ TR.H, ..' '�.d.•+ ..t«. _:.; x a c :_::. ... - - �✓`--may <br /> r Presentation and Discussion.of Results. In a contour plot' a contour line represents the same <br /> elevation along a line. A closed contour therefore indicates either.a depression or a mound. <br /> The presence of closed contours representing a deep depression is an unacceptable condition in <br /> the design of a liner system. <br /> The deformed surface elevations in each grid point are calculated by the computer <br /> program. The deformed surface contours on the 7 percent sloping surface are then plotted for <br /> each case, as shown on Figures EX—1 - EX 4. <br /> Where the thickness of the soil/waste layer is 1.8 m (6 feet), as shown on Figure EX 1, <br /> the presence of the void will curate a depression 9 cm (0.3 feet) deep. This depression could <br /> trap and accumulate liquids, hindering'the free flow of leachate towards a collection point. <br /> i <br /> When the thickness of the soil/waste layer above the void is increased to 2.25 in (7.5 <br /> feet), the depression is reduced to less than 3 cm (0.1 foot), as shown on Figure EX 2.- With <br /> a 2.7 m (9 foot) thick soil/waste layer over the void, the depression disappears. The disturbance <br /> in the liner surface decreases as the depth to the void increases, as seen when the thickness of <br /> the soil/waste layer is increased to 3.6 in (12 feet) (Figure EX—3 and EX 4). <br /> To evaluate the potential for grade reversal, a characteristic curve of required soil/waste <br /> thicknesses ('1) over a 0.9 in (3 feet) wide by 0.9 m (3 feet) deep by 1.8 in (6 feet) long void <br /> versus liner surface grades (a) is illustrated on Figure 3. <br /> 5.0 <br /> — E <br /> 4.0 0 <br /> N <br /> � N <br /> d d <br /> C O <br /> ° 2 3.0 0 <br /> o .00 <br /> U <br /> +' 0.0, <br /> N 2.0 0 <br /> 1 v 0 <br /> 3 <br /> o .6 1.0 0 <br /> N <br /> u <br /> 0.0 <br /> 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 <br /> Containment Liner Grade (degree) <br /> Figure 3 Required controlled fill thickness to prevent grade reversal ('I') <br /> versus containment liner grade (a) on 0.9m x 0.9m x 1.8m (3'x3'x6') void <br /> Geosynthctics'93-Vancouver,Canada-1505 <br />