Laserfiche WebLink
4.2.1 COVER CONFIGURATION <br /> The first step in using the LEACHM model involves definition of the soil profile. This is <br /> accomplished by defining the total thickness of the profile and a nodal or profile segment <br /> thickness. Modeling of the proposed alternative final cover system at the FSL was <br /> completed assuming a total final cover thickness of 4.0 feet. As a result, a total profile <br /> thickness of 1220-mm(4.0 feet) was stipulated, as was a nodal frequency of 152.5-mm <br /> (6-inches). This yielded a total of 8 profile segments or nodes and the analysis assessed <br /> water flux at each of these nodes ten times a day throughout the modeling period. <br /> 4.2.2 BOTTOM BOUNDARY CONDITIONS <br /> One of the most essential parameters included in the analysis a final cover proposed over <br /> municipal solid waste is definition of the bottom boundary condition of the final cover <br /> soil section. Based on recent large-scale demonstration project data, it is clear that the <br /> most realistic characterization of the bottom boundary is represented by the constant <br /> potential condition(GLA, 1999, GLA 2001, Lass et. al., 2000, Lass et. al., 2001). In this <br /> case, it is assumed that there is a source of moisture available within the landfill (e.g. high <br /> humidity landfill environment) that would represent a continuous source of moisture(and <br /> therefore constant potential)within the waste and near the base of the cover section. In <br /> addition to being the most realistic, this bottom boundary condition also allows for more <br /> effective characterization of two directional moisture movement and allows for the <br /> extraction of moisture through the final cover if drying conditions predominate(i.e., <br /> downward migration is calculated when the final cover moisture content is high and <br /> allows for extraction of water from the landfill [i.e., drying of the waste] when the <br /> moisture in the final cover is low). As a result, in estimating the nature of flow through <br /> the bottom boundary of the final cover section at the FSL, the constant potential boundary <br /> condition was utilized. <br /> 4.2.3 SOIL COVER CHARACTERISTICS <br /> For each node or interval in the defined profile, LEACHM requires input of specific soil <br /> properties including: remolded dry bulk density; initial matric potential and soil moisture <br /> content; Campbell's "a" and "b" coefficients <br /> (Campbell, G.S., 1974), and saturated hydraulic conductivity. Porosity is then calculated <br /> as a function of the stipulated specific gravity of the soils and their remolded dry bulk <br /> density. <br /> Prior to initiation of modeling, the existing cover and the proposed borrow source soils <br /> were tested for grain size(ASTM D-422), maximum density/optimum moisture (ASTM <br /> D-1557),hydraulic conductivity(ASTM D 5084), and matric potential testing(ASTM D- <br /> 6836) (Table 1). Table 2 lists the soil characteristics actually incorporated in modeling. <br /> It should be noted that for modeling purposes, the soil characteristics of a long-term <br /> weathered soil profile similar to the existing interim cover were utilized. Campbell's "a" <br /> and "b" coefficients were calculated using the LEACHM RETFIT program and are based <br /> on soil grain size distribution, bulk density,matric potentials and hydraulic conductivity. <br /> -4- <br /> C:\2005-0082\FOR WARD/Forwa rJCOVER.DOC\7/13/2005 <br /> Geologic Associates <br />