ARCHIVED REPORTS_2005_3 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

q4 also cited for an area of concern Section 20690 (a) (7), 27CCRfor the amount of ADC the site is receiving. The EHD previously asked for a justification of the amount of ADC and Beneficial reuse. The facility was also cited for an area of concern Section 20690 (a)(9), 27 CCR for temperature of green waste pile (see exhibit ff). On February 24, 2005, Michael Kith and Robert McClellon employees of the EHD conducted a monthly routine inspection and noted that the concentrations of methane gas in the monitoring probe GP 9 ranged from 6.1%to 53%. This was documented under the violation of Explosive Gases Control, Section 20919.5 of 27CCR. The facility was also cited for a violation Leachate Control Section 20790, 27 CCR(this was later revised per request of the operator to violation for Site Maintenance 20750, 27 CCR). The leachate was allowed to cross a road and collect in an onsite drainage. The operator had knowledge that the discharge was occurring and made no attempts to stop, divert or collect the leachate until the EHD found it. The facility was cited for an area of concern Section 20690, 27CCR for the amount of food waste contamination that was found in the ADC green waste. The facility was also cited for an area of concern Section 20690, 27CCRfor storing the stockpiled ADC with the disposal waste. There was no marker or separation from the ADC stockpile and the disposal area(see exhibit gg). On March 1, 2005 the EHD received a letter from the operations manager of Forward Inc. Landfill. The letter is a response to the January 2005, inspection of the facility (see exhibit hh). • On March 3, 2005 Ted Tasiopoulis an employee of the EHD received a request from San Joaquin County Storm Water Program to make an inspection at the Forward Inc. Landfill regarding a leachate release, picture were taken(see exhibit ii). On March 4, 2005, Robert McClellon of the EHD received an email form Heidi Melander of Brown, Vence and Associates, consultant for the City of Stockton. She was inquiring as to if the EHD had received anything regarding the justification of the amount of ADC Forward Inc. receives. Robert McClellon responded to her in March 14, 2005 stating the EHD had not received anything to date. On March 30, 2005, Michael Kith and Robert McClellon employees of the EHD conducted a monthly routine inspection and noted that the concentrations of methane gas in the monitoring probe GP 9 ranged from 20.8%to 55.7%. This was documented under the violation of Explosive Gases Control, Section 20919.5 of 27CCR. The facility was also cited for a violation Leachate Control Section 20790, 27CCR(this was later revised per request of the operator to violation for Site Maintenance 20750, 27CCR). The leachate was allowed to cross a road and collect in an onsite drainage. The operator made efforts to collect the leachate, but the discharge was still occurring. The facility was cited for an area of concern Section, 44014 (b), PRC, for the amount ADC and Beneficial reuse the facility was receiving. The EHD had previously requested the information at a meeting on December 16, 2004, on the inspection report of January 27, 2005, again at a meeting of March 15, 2005 and again on this inspection report(see exhibit jj). •