Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County Environmental Heath Department <br />State Focused Inspection Reoit= <br />Forward Landfill <br />SWIS #39 -AA -0015 <br />(d) The owner or operator shall maintain a record of beneficial reuse in accordance with Title 14, California Code of <br />Regulations, section 18800 et seq. The records shall be available for inspection by authorized representatives of the <br />enforcement agency, the local health agency, and the CIWMB during normal business hours and retained in the <br />operating record near the site or in an alternative location approved by the enforcement agency." <br />During the review of the tonnage reports for Forward Landfill it was noted that 9,726.03 tons of waste was identified as <br />beneficial reuse over four days from March 7, 2005 through March 10, 2005 and an additional 10,649.26 tons of waste <br />was identified as beneficial reuse over four days from February 22, 2005 through February 25, 2005. <br />Forward Representatives should provide the local enforcement agency and CIWMB staff information that clarifies how <br />this beneficial reuse material was used to avoid a finding of overuse of solid waste as beneficially reused. <br />As stated in Section 20686(b) above, "should the CIWMB determine that an owner or operator violated this standard, the <br />owner or operator shall revise the applicable reports to reflect the overuse as disposal, and pay the required Board of <br />Equalization disposal tipping fees for the amount of overuse." <br />This regulation (Section 20686 — Beneficial Reuse) also requires alternative daily cover reuse to comply with the <br />requirements of Section 20690. Section 20690(a)(7) states that "waste derived materials used as alternative daily cover <br />shall be restricted to quantities no more than necessary to meet the performance requirements of this section. Should the <br />CIWMB determine after consulting with the enforcement agency that an owner or operator violated this standard, the <br />owner or operator shall revise the applicable reports to reflect the overuse as disposal, and pay the required Board of <br />Equalization disposal tipping fees for the amount of overuse." <br />During the review of the tonnage reports for Forward Landfill it was noted that on 28 separate occasions the facility had <br />a refuse to cover ratio of approximately 3:1 or less over a 66 day period. This is in conflict with Forward Landfill's <br />Report of Disposal Site Information which states that the refuse to cover ratio is 6:1. <br />Per the regulations, Forward Representatives need to provide the local enforcement agency and CIWMB staff <br />information that clarifies the use of cover material at Forward Landfill. 0 <br />2. Section 20690(a)(5) — Alternative Daily Cover — General Requirements. This section states, in part, that the "owner <br />or operator shall maintain'a record of waste derived alternative daily cover in accordance with Title 14, California Code <br />of Regulations, Section 18800 et. seq. The records shall be available for inspection by authorized representatives of the <br />enforcement agency, the local health agency, and the CIWMB during normal business hours and retained in the <br />operating record near the site or in an alternative location approved by the enforcement agency. <br />Per a review of several months worth of Daily Cover Certification records used by Forward Landfill it was noted that <br />each record indicated that green waste alternative daily cover or a combination of green waste alternative daily cover and <br />tarpaulins were used on a regular basis. However, on the day of the inspection the working face was covered with <br />treated auto shredder waste and Forward Landfill representatives indicated that treated auto shredder waste had been <br />used frequently over the past several months. When asked why the Daily Cover Certification records did not indicate <br />any use of treated auto shredder waste local enforcement agency staff and CIWMB staff were told that site personnel <br />probably just fill out the form the same way every day. If the records provided do indeed misrepresent what was actually <br />occurring at the site during the period reviewed, this area of concern could be noted as a violation. <br />The only tonnage records immediately available for review at the focused inspection were from February 1, 2005 <br />through April 18, 2005. Forward Representatives stated that they would send the remaining inspections reports covering <br />a one year period (April 20, 2004 through January 31, 2005) via the Federal Express delivery service. At the time this <br />inspection report was mailed, May 4, 2005, CIWMB staff had not received the requested tonnage records. <br />v <br />Page 6 of 6 Inspector <br />