Laserfiche WebLink
Robert McClellon [EH] <br />A&PM: Robert McClellon [EH] <br />t: Friday, October 14, 2005 8:21 AM <br />O. 'Curt. Fujii@awin.com' <br />Cc: 'kkennedy@ciwmb.ca.gov' <br />Subject: FW: <br />Wwm <br />Class-II <br />I_Limits.pd... <br />Curt, as we discussed during the meeting the soil that would qualify as soil <br />to be brought in above the tonnage cap would be only clean soil. You drafted a letter and <br />forwarded that to me. In the letter you state that there are no levels set for other <br />metals and that you would use them throughout the facility as beneficial reuse. The RWQCB <br />provided this list and I would like it to be incorporated into your letter. During the <br />meeting @ the CIWMB. I stated that the clean soils could not be soils that are considered <br />Class II. You stated that they are not. Please let me know what you think. Robert <br />The meeting on the 21st is here and how about 10:00 am. Thanks Robert <br />-----Original Message ----- <br />From: Ross Atkinson [mailto: <br />Sent: Wednesday, October 12, <br />To: Robert McClellon [EH] <br />Subject: Re: <br />ratkinson@waterboards.ca.gov] <br />2005 2:51 PM <br />Robert - <br />ached is a table Jon Marshack worked up about a year ago with designated waste levels <br />om WET test data. Forward has 30 feet or so to groundwater and clay rich soils (better <br />than average attenuation) so use the 'High' column for designated levels based on degree <br />of attenuation. Hope this helps. <br />Ross <br />Ross Atkinson <br />Associate Engineering Geologist <br />Waste Discharge to Land Unit <br />Central Valley RWQCB - Sacramento <br />ph. (916) 464-4614 <br />email: ratkinson@waterboards.ca.gov <br />><((((°>. <br />><((((°> .. .. ...><((((°> <br />>>> "Robert McClellon [EH]" <RMcClellon@sjcehd.com> 09/28/2005 11:06 AM >>> <br />Ross, please review and comment. The EHD and The CIWMB staff are trying to determine how <br />clean is clean. The letter references metals with soluble concentrations up to hazardous <br />waste levels being used through the facility. I was wondering is that ok with you folks, <br />or are you concerned with other metals such as Arsenic below hazardous levels and would <br />they be considered designated waste. Thanks Robert <br />-----Original Message ----- <br />From: Ross Atkinson [mailto:ratkinson@waterboards.ca.gov] <br />Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:37 AM <br />To: Robert McClellon [EH] <br />Subject: Santa Fe Road Landfill <br />AMLI- <br />ert <br />ctor and I got together and put our concerns into a letter. The draft letter is <br />attached, please take a look and tell me if it is consistent with the County's concerns. <br />Thanks <br />1 <br />