Laserfiche WebLink
SOLUBLE DESIGNATED LEVEL FOR SOIL <br />AT A CONTAMINATED SITE <br />DOMESTIC <br />WATER <br />WELL CONTAMINATED SITE <br />0.005 x in mg soluble As / kg soil <br />).005 x n liter of extract <br />in:a-*J..,.,..from the WET <br />T <br />Arsenic <br />(o.005 x n) liter of <br />leachate <br />n— FOLD <br />ATTENUATION <br />0.005 mg Arsenic / liter of water GROUND <br />( Proposition 65 regulatory level I WATER <br />FLOW <br />Figure 8 <br />for conditions that exist at the site. The standard WET <br />uses an buffered acidic extraction solution designed to <br />account for the acidic conditions often encountered in <br />sanitary landfills. If soils at the site being investigated <br />will only exist under neutral or basic conditions, deion- <br />ized water or another more suitable extraction solution <br />may be substituted for the standard WET buffer solu- <br />tion. <br />SOIL CLEANUP LEVELS <br />If contaminated soils are found to threaten benefi- <br />cial uses of ground or surface water resources, cleanup <br />levels must be chosen. To satisfy the antidegradation <br />policy, and recently readopted State Water Board Reso- <br />lution No. 92-49, Policies and Procedures for Investigation <br />and Cleanup and Abatement of Discharges Under Water <br />Code Section 13304, background concentrations of con- <br />taminants must be chosen as cleanup levels, unless <br />background levels are technologically or economically <br />infeasible to achieve. <br />If background levels are determined to be infea- <br />sible, cleanup levels greater than background may be <br />selected. As detailed in §2550.4 of Title 23 of CCR, suct <br />:leanup levels must: <br />ā‘ be the lowest concentrations for the individual <br />pollutants which are technologically and eco- <br />nomically achievable; <br />ā‘ not pose a hazard to health or to the environ- <br />ment; and <br />ā‘ not exceed the maximum concentrations allow- <br />able under applicable statutes and regulations <br />for individual pollutants, including applicable <br />water quality standards. <br />While conventional risk assessment can be used to <br />satisfy the second of these requirements, this technique <br />will not satisfy the third requirement. Designated Lev- <br />els for contaminated soil constituents, calculated by <br />using the Designated Level Methodology, may be used to <br />determine compliance with this last requirement, i.e., <br />that remaining contaminants do not threaten to exceed <br />California's water quality standards. <br />CONCLUSION AND STATUS <br />When combined with the waste classification, site <br />assessment, and cleanup level setting processes of <br />DTSC and the State Water Board's Chapter 15 regula- <br />tions, The Designated Level Methodology can provide a <br />complimentary set of procedures to ensure the protec- <br />tion of both public health and California's water re- <br />sources. Comments received during public review of <br />an early draft of The Designated Level Methodology staff <br />report were used to produce the October 1986 edition. <br />In June 1989, an updated edition of the report was pro- <br />duced to'bring the document in line with then -existing <br />statutes, regulations, and waste testing methods. Fur- <br />ther updating of this nature is needed, and will be <br />made as Regional Board staff resources are made avail- <br />able for the effort. <br />Staff of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality <br />Control Board has shared this report with the State <br />Water Board and the other Regional Water Boards, and <br />has been working with staff of the State Water Board to <br />develop statewide policy in this area. <br />Copies of The Designated Level Methodology staff re- <br />port my be obtained from the reception desk at the Sacra- <br />mento Office of the Regional Water Board. <br />Page 8 Summary of The Designated Level Methodology <br />