ARCHIVED REPORTS_2005_4 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

P.O.Box 6336 FORWARD 1145 W.Charter Way Stockton,CA 95206 I N C 0 R P 0 R A T E D (209)466-4482•(800)204-4242-FAX(209)466-1067 1 ILI 1-" Mr. Robert McClellan Environmental Health and Safety Department San Joaquin County ENVIRONWN1- HEAU-111 304 East Weber Avenue,Third Floor PERNIM/SEIRVICES Stockton, CA 95202 Dear Robert: We agreed to provide this follow-up correspondence to the recent meeting with California Integrated Waste Management Board Staff regarding the State Inspection Report on Forward Landfill dated May 4, 2005. This letter is intended to summarize our position on the issues raised in that inspection report, to establish an understanding of the items of agreement and to set the stage for the development of our proposed action plan for addressing the issues raised in the report. We appreciate your willingness to attempt to reach reasonable solutions for the issues covered by the report. We will provide you with an action plan by Monday, May 16, 2005 and we forward to discussing that action plan with you at your convenience later that week. i. Daily Tonnage Received ❖ We conceded at the meeting that the daily tonnage and weekly tonnage cap includes all disposed waste and all soils considered to be designated wastes or required to be disposed by Air Pollution Control District rules. ❖ We conceded that the Monthly tonnage reports submitted to the LEA need to be revised to more clearly state the amount and type of material received for use as Alternative Daily Cover, other cover and other forms of beneficial reuse. However, reports previously submitted to the LEA and Board staff clearly and accurately reflect the total amount of disposed waste and waste materials used for cover(including ADC)and other beneficial reuse. We will submit to the LEA on May 16, 2005 a revised reporting format. i't We dispute the LEA interpretation that all materials received at the gate count against the daily and weekly cap and will provide the LEA on May 16, 2005 further support for this interpretation or an alternative plan for maintaining reasonable tonnage caps for the facility.