Laserfiche WebLink
III. On July 25, 2002,this LEA conducted routine-inspection and noted that the <br /> concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probe GP-10, located a few <br /> feet north of the scale house,was 10%. <br /> IV. In August 2002,Forward, Inc. submitted a Gas Monitoring Probe Working Plan <br /> to this LEA and, subsequently, installed the gas extraction system and the flare <br /> station. <br /> V. On September 6,2002,this LEA conducted routine inspection and noted that <br /> the concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probe GP-10, located a <br /> few feet north of the scale house, was less than 5%. <br /> VI. In May 2003, Forward, Inc. had completed the installation of multilevel gas <br /> monitoring probes at the boundaries. The probes were renumbered beginning <br /> with GP-1 at the main gate and the subsequent numbers were toward the south. <br /> VII. On June 27,2003,this LEA conducted routine inspection and noted that the <br /> concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probe GP-9 (which replaces <br /> GP-2), located near the west boundary, was 18 %. This was documented under <br /> the violation of Gas Control, Section 20919 of Title 27 of California Code of <br /> Regulation (27CCR). <br /> VIII. On July 29,2003,this LEA conducted routine inspection and noted that the <br /> concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probes GP-8 (which <br /> replaces GP-3)and GP-9 (which replaces GP-2), both of which were located <br /> near the west boundary,was 8% and 18 %, respectively. This was documented <br /> under the violation of Gas Control, Section 20919 of Title 27 of California Code <br /> of Regulation(27CCR). <br /> IX. On July 30,2003,The Regensis Group, Contractor, of 2210 South Asuza <br /> Avenue, West Covina,California, submitted a plan to install gas extraction <br /> system that would be connected to the existing flare station. <br /> X. On August 28,2003,this LEA conducted routine inspection and noted that the <br /> concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probes GP-9(which <br /> 4- replaces GP-2),located near the west boundary,.was 37%. This was <br /> documented under the-violation of Gas Control, Section 20919 of Title 27 of <br /> California Code of Regulation(27CCR). <br /> XI. On September 30,2003,this LEA conducted routine inspection and noted that <br /> the concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probe GP-9 (which <br /> replaces GP-2),located near the west boundary,was 37%. This was <br /> documented under the violation of Explosive Gases Control, Section 20919.5 of <br /> 27CCR. <br /> Amended Notice and Order 03-01 Page 2 of 7 Forward Landfill <br /> May 10,2004 <br />