Laserfiche WebLink
In addition, under the CCR Title 27 § 20080 (c)(1) the StateWater Resources <br />Control Board (SWRCB) requires the discharger to demonstrate that the <br />prescriptive is not feasible because it: <br />"is unreasonable and unnecessarily burdensome and will cost substantially <br />more than alternatives which meet the criteria in § 20080 (b)" <br />The purpose of this report is to evaluate the feasibility of constructing a <br />prescriptive final cover in conformance with 27 CCR Section 21090(a) over the <br />Phase I final closure area of the FSL but then allowing the cover to weather over <br />time. As a result of the anticipated weathering, the final cover section is expected <br />to evolve into an alternative final cover hosting a relatively deep roofing plant <br />community and exhibiting a saturated hydraulic conductivity in excess of the <br />prescriptive minimum standard. As such, this report presents an evaluation of <br />whether the performance of the proposed alternative final cover performance is <br />consistent with the performance goals addressed by the prescriptive standards, by <br />yielding equivalent or superior protection against water quality impairment. <br />I M�XKIJ 9 DKIJ 21 L10 I'M RN <br />Work completed during this study included: <br />I . Collection of bulk soil samples from the proposed borrow source adjacent to <br />the FSL (Figure 1); <br />2. Collection of in-situ ring samples from the existing cover soils; <br />3. Determination of the thickness of the existing cover over the North and <br />Northwest slope closure footprint (Figure 1); <br />4. Laboratory testing and evaluation of existing interim cover and potential <br />borrow soils in accordance with ASTM standards; <br />5. Selection of representative characteristics of soils derived from the on-site <br />borrow source and the existing cover; <br />6. Obtaining local climatological data for the area of the FSL; <br />7. Selection of a computer program to simulate unsaturated flow through the soil <br />profile; <br />8. Computer modeling of the proposed non -prescriptive cover system using the <br />laboratory soil test results and historic local climatic data; <br />9. Preparation of this report and the attached CQA Plan (Appendix Q. <br />-2- <br />C:\2003-033\EDOM HILL ALTERNATIVE COVER.DOC\6/16/2005 <br />E <br />E <br />GeoLogic Associates <br />